Breaking records/stats thread

Gigant said:
View attachment 131908

Can somebody confirm does this one is accurate
Click to expand...
Where do they get this crap from? I'm not expecting all graphics makers to know City's histroy, but can they not use Wikipedia, FFS.

Complete bollocks, Raheem isn't even in the Top 10, never mind 2nd. Bell & Lee both scored more, the previous top goal scorer before Sergio, Eric Brook, is completely missing... just total bollocks
 
jimharri said:
@Gary James,

Is that our latest goal in the PL era? I know Stephen Ireland got a very late goal against (I think) Reading, back in the days of B&W telly. Not sure it was quite that late, mind!
Click to expand...
Raz v Southampton 2-1. Very late winner possibly in the centurions (2017-18) season.
Or Raz again at Bournemouth, 97th minutes IIRC. Much madness in the stands.
 
jimharri said:
@Gary James,

Is that our latest goal in the PL era? I know Stephen Ireland got a very late goal against (I think) Reading, back in the days of B&W telly. Not sure it was quite that late, mind!
Click to expand...
The BBC claimed it was our latest but I thought we'd had later myself. It's a bit of an odd one too because do we count all the added time in both halves? If we do then I guess it was our latest. If we only count added time in second half then why? If you've 7 minutes added each half and someone scores in last minute that would be the 104th minute if we counted it all. Maths and stats, hey? It's all a bit bonkers to be honest. I guess we can call it however we want to call it. Oh, don't get me started on the debate about whether a win after penalties is classed as a win in sequence records or not - common sense needed there. I'd love to see the reaction a journalist would get if he went up to Pep after a defeat on penalties and say: 'congratulations on keeping your unbeaten record'.
 
Gary James said:
The BBC claimed it was our latest but I thought we'd had later myself. It's a bit of an odd one too because do we count all the added time in both halves? If we do then I guess it was our latest. If we only count added time in second half then why? If you've 7 minutes added each half and someone scores in last minute that would be the 104th minute if we counted it all. Maths and stats, hey? It's all a bit bonkers to be honest. I guess we can call it however we want to call it. Oh, don't get me started on the debate about whether a win after penalties is classed as a win in sequence records or not - common sense needed there. I'd love to see the reaction a journalist would get if he went up to Pep after a defeat on penalties and say: 'congratulations on keeping your unbeaten record'.
Click to expand...
Re the time, I was going by the official time recorded for the goal. As for game time, regardless of how much additional time is played at the end of the first half, the game clock restarts at 45:01 at the kick off for the second half, doesn't it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.