paulsimpson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 2,830
You've built up a straw man to knock it down and make it look like the argument is won.Yeah you couldn't be wrong about this, an axiom is something that is presumed to be self evidentially true for the purposes of the argument and not something that is true but we can go into this later if you like.
You're telling me that if the Universe were actually a purple dinosaur called Pete then some other things would be true. Which is perfectly fine, but the Universe is not a purple dinosaur called Pete any more than the first clause in your statement is true. Essentially you've built your whole argument on false assumptions so you can really come to any conclusion that you like and it makes no difference because the starting point was false.
I've not made any assumptions at all I've made premises based on logical fact . There is no fallacy in the argument at all . The starting point is scientifically verified at the beginning point which avoids the infinite regress one cannot avoid if one takes the view that the universe has an infinite past which it doesn't . An infinite past cannot be reached scientifically ( e.g. entropy) or philosophically ( by reason) so that whatever comes into being has a cause . Hawking ,Dawkins et al. cannot avoid this .
So the universe either created itself or a timeless , space -less personal creator did