British Justice ... it sucks in this instance.

oakiecokie said:
tidyman said:
oakiecokie said:
He operates Car Sales.

And the other question?

By saying to the police in a report that Anthony had NO glass/bottle with him when entering the bogs.

I think they can rest easy mate.

I highly doubt a bunch of his friends giving their verdicts on an incident they didn't see, would have much influence on anything.
 
So, in summary, a bloke tells another bloke in the pub to fuck off, bloke gets a kicking, 1st blokes uterus prolapses and he goes running to the police. Right?
 
oakiecokie said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
oakiecokie said:
You have a very short memory.I suggest you look at how many posts on this thread that are attributed to your stance on our "gun totting American friends" !! Talk about a dog with a bone on a subject.
Stay away from the thread if it gives you that much consternation,a very easy solution.

What gives me 'consternation' is you talking utter shite.
Your 'mate' is a convicted violent thug, whether you like it or not.
You also stated earlier that the victim had never done a day's work in his life - now he's a fucking car salesman all of a sudden.
There is no point in trying to discuss this rationally with you, because you are simply blind to the truth, because Ant is a friend.
Loyalty is an admirable commodity, but in your case it means you can't see the wood for the trees here.
Anyway, I'll leave you to your campaign for 'justice'.

A private car salesman who works from his home.I think you need to look back on the posts because not only once,twice or thrice times I have stated that he admitted his guilt but a denial of striking someone with a bottle that never existed.
I certainly don`t support Ant for what he`s done but talking about being blind is ridiculous but then again you are doing exactly the same and condeming him for something which never actually happened.
As many people have said of you in the past,a dog with a bone with a lot of wummery.Just read back on your posts to the American guys.WOW talk about me being blind,you take the biscuit.

You really are beginning to look increasingly stupid here.
What myself and 99% of the forum have tried to do is look at this case with as detached and objective a view as possible.
Because that is what you can do when you are not personally involved by knowing the accused.
You, on the other hand, have blindly accepted the word of a violent convicted criminal as gospel, and think you know better than both the presiding judge and the legal profession.
I didn't ask some daft sherman to come on and start prattling about guns and reasonable force, but when he did, then I replied, because I thought he was talking bollocks.
Which he was.
That's kind of how this forum thingummy works.
There has been no wummery by me on this thread - just a load of utter baloney from you trying to make out that some dickhead who launched a premeditated attack on someone is a victim of a miscarriage of justice, which is utter drivel.
You even lied about the victims employment status - initially he 'didn't have a day's work in him', then all of a sudden he was a used car salesman who works from home.
Most folk on here think he is bang to rights - the fact that he has decided not to appeal shows that he does too, yet still you won't let it go, so you move the goalposts instead.
But you carry on blaming me and an unfair criminal justice system if it makes you happy.
 
40 pages on this thread

I would print it off and send to Ant, it will give him something to read on those boring nights
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
oakiecokie said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
What gives me 'consternation' is you talking utter shite.
Your 'mate' is a convicted violent thug, whether you like it or not.
You also stated earlier that the victim had never done a day's work in his life - now he's a fucking car salesman all of a sudden.
There is no point in trying to discuss this rationally with you, because you are simply blind to the truth, because Ant is a friend.
Loyalty is an admirable commodity, but in your case it means you can't see the wood for the trees here.
Anyway, I'll leave you to your campaign for 'justice'.

A private car salesman who works from his home.I think you need to look back on the posts because not only once,twice or thrice times I have stated that he admitted his guilt but a denial of striking someone with a bottle that never existed.
I certainly don`t support Ant for what he`s done but talking about being blind is ridiculous but then again you are doing exactly the same and condeming him for something which never actually happened.
As many people have said of you in the past,a dog with a bone with a lot of wummery.Just read back on your posts to the American guys.WOW talk about me being blind,you take the biscuit.

You really are beginning to look increasingly stupid here.
What myself and 99% of the forum have tried to do is look at this case with as detached and objective a view as possible.
Because that is what you can do when you are not personally involved by knowing the accused.
You, on the other hand, have blindly accepted the word of a violent convicted criminal as gospel, and think you know better than both the presiding judge and the legal profession.
I didn't ask some daft sherman to come on and start prattling about guns and reasonable force, but when he did, then I replied, because I thought he was talking bollocks.
Which he was.
That's kind of how this forum thingummy works.
There has been no wummery by me on this thread - just a load of utter baloney from you trying to make out that some dickhead who launched a premeditated attack on someone is a victim of a miscarriage of justice, which is utter drivel.
You even lied about the victims employment status - initially he 'didn't have a day's work in him', then all of a sudden he was a used car salesman who works from home.
Most folk on here think he is bang to rights - the fact that he has decided not to appeal shows that he does too, yet still you won't let it go, so you move the goalposts instead.
But you carry on blaming me and an unfair criminal justice system if it makes you happy.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
oakiecokie said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
What gives me 'consternation' is you talking utter shite.
Your 'mate' is a convicted violent thug, whether you like it or not.
You also stated earlier that the victim had never done a day's work in his life - now he's a fucking car salesman all of a sudden.
There is no point in trying to discuss this rationally with you, because you are simply blind to the truth, because Ant is a friend.
Loyalty is an admirable commodity, but in your case it means you can't see the wood for the trees here.
Anyway, I'll leave you to your campaign for 'justice'.

A private car salesman who works from his home.I think you need to look back on the posts because not only once,twice or thrice times I have stated that he admitted his guilt but a denial of striking someone with a bottle that never existed.
I certainly don`t support Ant for what he`s done but talking about being blind is ridiculous but then again you are doing exactly the same and condeming him for something which never actually happened.
As many people have said of you in the past,a dog with a bone with a lot of wummery.Just read back on your posts to the American guys.WOW talk about me being blind,you take the biscuit.

You really are beginning to look increasingly stupid here.
What myself and 99% of the forum have tried to do is look at this case with as detached and objective a view as possible.
Because that is what you can do when you are not personally involved by knowing the accused.
You, on the other hand, have blindly accepted the word of a violent convicted criminal as gospel, and think you know better than both the presiding judge and the legal profession.
I didn't ask some daft sherman to come on and start prattling about guns and reasonable force, but when he did, then I replied, because I thought he was talking bollocks.
Which he was.
That's kind of how this forum thingummy works.
There has been no wummery by me on this thread - just a load of utter baloney from you trying to make out that some dickhead who launched a premeditated attack on someone is a victim of a miscarriage of justice, which is utter drivel.
You even lied about the victims employment status - initially he 'didn't have a day's work in him', then all of a sudden he was a used car salesman who works from home.
Most folk on here think he is bang to rights - the fact that he has decided not to appeal shows that he does too, yet still you won't let it go, so you move the goalposts instead.
But you carry on blaming me and an unfair criminal justice system if it makes you happy.

If you regard buying cars,not doing any work on them and reselling them on is classified as "work",then you`re plain stupid.This is a guy who for years has being claiming benefits,at your expense and yet you offer more support for this waster and lying twat.
Please show me where I have ever stated that Anthony has been wrongly convicted of the crime he only committed,hitting someone with head and fists.The debate was and is for a wrong conviction of assault with a glass/bottle. and guess which carries a heavier sentence ?? The one that he`s been wrongly convicted of due to one lying piece of shit.He has already been told to shut the fuck up in the pub about his claims and for some unknown reason he decided to leave the pub early that night.Whats not so easy to understand that part NOT GUILTY of using a bottle/glass but GUILTY and rightly charged with hitting someone with fists and head.Two vast differences and something you can`t get your tiny pea brained head around,as you only come on here to continual wum,something which the world and his wife know about.
Anything controversial and guess who`s there to start a bash ?
Yes the one and only NF.
 
You're a fucking idiot Oakie.
It really is that simple.
Everyone on here knows your mate is a violent thug.
The judge knows he's a violent thug.
He has lied to you, as you have lied to us.
Carry on making yourself look even dafter if you like though.
And while you're at it, please point out just how disagreeing with you, as does the rest of the forum, qualify as wummng.
You used to be a decent poster, but on this thread you have lost the fucking plot in spectacular fashion.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
You're a fucking idiot Oakie.
It really is that simple.
Everyone on here knows your mate is a violent thug.
The judge knows he's a violent thug.
He has lied to you, as you have lied to us.
Carry on making yourself look even dafter if you like though.
And while you're at it, please point out just how disagreeing with you, as does the rest of the forum, qualify as wummng.
You used to be a decent poster, but on this thread you have lost the fucking plot in spectacular fashion.

Thats the main point of the point ain`t it,who do you believe and from day one you have been one of most vociferous ones on here claiming the guy is as guilty as fuck because he`s already admitted to assault,so in your eyes he must be guilty of also using a bottle.
Anthony was ready for a prison sentence for the assault but for the other lying twat who claimed weeks later that he head wounds from the attack of a bottled assault is a coont,not for being hit but for deliberate lying.Strange how everyone else in the pub and were present when the event happened have also come down in favour of Anthony.
Up until last night I was not aware and neither was Anthony that this guy and his family had been moved from one council estate to another by the Local Council.That information came from a well established Local Councillor who a few years ago was involved in the move to relocate this guy and his family for constant abuse to fellow neighbours.
Yes you carry on supporting him.I`d live next door to Anthony any day of the week thank you.
 
Youve made your point some will symathise with you some wont ,thats life .take it on the chin dont be bitterit wont do you any good move on & ge ton with your life
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top