Britney Spears at it again

Didsbury Dave said:
I'd say it was age which broke Hammann

If it is Hamann, and it's not been confirmed by Neil McNab,it was ZZ who broke this one about a fortnight ago.
 
smiler1234uk said:
Can I also add TFM on Citymancs seems pretty confident on JM being at City 22nd June could this still happen (I know Im clingin on here) but to be fair to the lad hes been consistent and kept the same information going for many months now! Whatd you think ZZ>?


TFM is a snot gobbling wankstain who knows less about the goings on at City than a stray dog.
 
stony said:
smiler1234uk said:
Can I also add TFM on Citymancs seems pretty confident on JM being at City 22nd June could this still happen (I know Im clingin on here) but to be fair to the lad hes been consistent and kept the same information going for many months now! Whatd you think ZZ>?


TFM is a snot gobbling wankstain who knows less about the goings on at City than a stray dog.

Why dont you say how you really feel about him/her!!!!! ;-)
 
Smiler my standpoint is in the original post, he is going to madrid, if he comes to city i'll look a bigger prize tool than neil Mcflab and his Exclusive, though would gladly take that if proved wrong, alas though hardy, it isn't going to happen, thats unless jose has a change of heart. SI is very difficult situation, he deserves parity with top earners, a offer of a progressive contract, ie going up each year is quite sound business, however it should be like that across the board. He was the one who insisted on putting the negotiations on the back burner until the end of the season, though it seems to of riled him, think this is a none story however, he'l sign.
 
Just my opinions but I find Zimmer's posts poisonous. He seems to have no genuine feeling for the club, otherwise he'd be less concerned with the style in which he delivers his supposed inside info. How can anyone who is truely blue delight in bringing us worrying info? I honestly believe he is having a good laugh about getting people worked up and to me that's mischievous and inexcusable.

Everyone's entitled to their own opinion of course. Mine is that to keep the standard of this forum, now's about the right time to ban Zimmer. I know lots of people wouldn't want this and ethically I guess it's questionable. But I think once a poster has proven themselves to be nothing more than attention seeking troublemakers it's about time to give them the flick to keep the board from imploding in abuse.
 
TonyM said:
I think once a poster has proven themselves to be nothing more than attention seeking troublemakers it's about time to give them the flick to keep the board from imploding in abuse.

Do that and you will have a board with possibly eight people left on it lol
 
Nixon_The_Bike_Thief said:
TonyM said:
I think once a poster has proven themselves to be nothing more than attention seeking troublemakers it's about time to give them the flick to keep the board from imploding in abuse.

Do that and you will have a board with possibly eight people left on it lol

I'm waiting for the downside of your point.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.