Sadly it's that kind of response that makes me think the interview will be futile. It'll be standard, generic answers along the lines of that email.I got this response
Dear Ian,
Thanks for the note regarding Danny Mills and the BT Sport coverage of the Champions League. I appreciate that viewers have opinions that matter and I’ve had 8 separate but similar complaints regarding Danny Mills which I want to provide a consistent response to each.
As you know all broadcasters use many ex-professional footballers all of whom have different but relevant experience in the game and all of whom are asked to express their opinions and react to the action on the field as they see fit. This provides a range of opinion and richness that we feel is important to football coverage on television. At this time of year it is not as easy as you suggest to pick from a list of BT Sport regulars or ex-Manchester City players who you quote. Danny is an ex England and Manchester City footballer who has extensive broadcast experience on radio and television and I am sorry that his interpretation of what he saw does not always agree with yours.
At BT Sport we’d like to have fair and good relations with all sets of supporters all the time but we are not inexperienced enough to realise that this is not always achievable all of the time but we do listen so thanks for the feedback. With regard to next season I still believe that the best Champions League pundits are those with experience of winning it and at the same time who can instil debate and discussion.
Regards
Simon Green
The worse part is he makes valid points with his argument yet has somehow failed to grasp the point that it's the actual pundits they choose, not the reasoning behind it. You can have knowledgable players who have history in broadcasting and have won the trophies. They just don't need to be ex rags who can't make cohesive points due to their bitterness.