Burnley (A) | Pre-Match Thread

Match Result Prediction


  • Total voters
    451
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Couldn’t agree more.

Flat track bully.
I'm not Mahrez's biggest fan but I think that is harsh. He was afforded a lot more space and rarely played against packed defences for Leicester. Meant he could get his paceup and get passed a defender. Lot more difficult to do that when we push teams so far back.

I mostly blame Pep for this as he went against what we were good at and tried to find a tactic in Inverted wingers to evolve us when it really wasn't required.

As is being proven now, we are much better with natural width
 
Ederson
Cancelo
Stones
Dias
Laporte
Rodri
Gundogan
Bernardo
Sterling
Marhez
Jesus

0 - 2 City
 
Sterling - Jesus - Mahrez
Gundo - Rodri - Bernardo
Cancelo - Laporte - Dias - Walker
Eddy

I want to save Fernandinho, Stones, Ferran and Foden for Liverpool. Jesus need to find his shooting boots and Walker really have to find form and fast. We’ll need him soon.

I’d never thought I would say the sentence ”save Stones for Liverpool” ahead of Laporte, but he’s been that good, and the CB-chemistry need to be spotless on Sunday.

I don’t believe in Sterling getting past Trent so I prefer to surprise Klopp playing Ferran on the wing instead. But it will probably not happen. Sterling seem undroppable to Pep.
"Trent"?

Are you Jermaine Jenas in disguise?

Single names are reserved for top players.
Pele and Puskas, for example.
 
"Trent"?

Are you Jermaine Jenas in disguise?

Single names are reserved for top players.
Pele and Puskas, for example.

I save time not having to enter ”Trent Alexander-Arnold”. I don’t see the problem, and neither should you.
This is not a place to hand in essays, is it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.