Ian Paisley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 138
Scott Parker ? When Craig Bellamy was signed a few eyebrows were raised but he's probably first on the team sheet for most.I wonder if Parker could add whats missing
thepole said:Here is what I think
We tried to play a very high defensive line to negate the threat of Crouch - perfectly understandable, just look what happened when we dropped deep - 85 yard ball, Crouch wins the flick - goal.
However, this created problems - the middle of the park got very congested, and players that rely on space to create things couldn't find any. We had no natural width and therefore Spurs could flood the middle of the park and were able to negate much of our attacking threat.
If we had natural width we could have carried much more of a threat, but then Petrov is still coming back from injury and Weiss is young and inexperienced and would have undoubtedly got absolutely slated if he had a bad game, Hughes obviously didn't want to knock his confidence. In hindsight we should probably have taken the risk and played one of the two.
So in conclusion Hughes got it wrong, but I can completely understand his reasoning behind the tactics, it just didn't work for him. If one of our early long range efforts had flown in we could have stolen a win, but it wasn't to be. That being said I think a couple of the players really should be giving a lot more to the cause, and that certainly didn't help our chances.
spot on mate Bellamy was a huge miss last night and that wasn`t hughes fault nor the injury to Bridge.thepole said:Here is what I think
We tried to play a very high defensive line to negate the threat of Crouch - perfectly understandable, just look what happened when we dropped deep - 85 yard ball, Crouch wins the flick - goal.
However, this created problems - the middle of the park got very congested, and players that rely on space to create things couldn't find any. We had no natural width and therefore Spurs could flood the middle of the park and were able to negate much of our attacking threat.
If we had natural width we could have carried much more of a threat, but then Petrov is still coming back from injury and Weiss is young and inexperienced and would have undoubtedly got absolutely slated if he had a bad game, Hughes obviously didn't want to knock his confidence. In hindsight we should probably have taken the risk and played one of the two.
So in conclusion Hughes got it wrong, but I can completely understand his reasoning behind the tactics, it just didn't work for him. If one of our early long range efforts had flown in we could have stolen a win, but it wasn't to be. That being said I think a couple of the players really should be giving a lot more to the cause, and that certainly didn't help our chances.
pee dubya said:I think we still lack a true leader, someone who will take a game that's going away from us, and pull the rest of the team through, just as an example - Gerrard.
NQT said:pee dubya said:I think we still lack a true leader, someone who will take a game that's going away from us, and pull the rest of the team through, just as an example - Gerrard.
How often in the last five years have you seen a City player "boss" a game?