Cameron The Liar - lets his mask slip again

Compassionate conservatism my arse.
People who have been stripped of benefits could be charged by the government for trying to appeal against the decision to an independent judge.

Critics said the proposal, contained in an internal Department for Work and Pensions document leaked to the Guardian, would hit some of the poorest people in Britain, who have been left with little or no income.

In the document about the department's internal finances, officials say the "introduction of a charge for people making appeals against [DWP] decisions to social security tribunals" would raise money.

Other ideas include selling off child support debt to "the private sector to collect", though civil servants remark that the government would be unlikely to raise more than 5-7p in the pound from the £1.4bn currently owed to the DWP. The department currently collects arrears.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/20/people-stripped-benefits-charged-decision" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... d-decision</a>
 
Len Rum said:
de niro said:
its funny how all the shouting is coming from the loony left, they are always raising their point scoring bollocks, camerons this camerons that. the fairer minded and more knowledable tory posters just keep their head down as they know there is still work to be done regardless of the incredible strides that have been made since taking power.


*pats the loonies on the head and says go and run I'm busy*
But as a "knowledable (sic) tory poster" you were calling the country "a shit hole" earlier on in this thread. Explain.

Too many lefties in it. Oh and Cadgers.
 
mcmanus said:
pantalon violet said:
SWP's back said:
Is it hell as like a nonsequitur. It shows that as education increases, faith decreases across a populace. I can pull all sorts of studies off the bet for that one if needs be. (Currently awaiting a client in a coffee house so on my phone).

But anyway, in your post, you have agreed with my first point, a church delegation are no more important than anyone else.

I still don't see why anyone should show more tolerance to a group, just because it is popular though. In your warped logic, it probably makes sense, but I as repeatedly state, I don't accept anything just because it is popular.


How much did you charge him for right said Fred gay sex?








I'm in trouble now

Boyblue was on his way.

Ha from you thats quite funny
 
CITYBOY1000 said:
Kun Aguero said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-camerons-constituency-office-calls-police-on-food-bank-campaigners-bishop-of-oxford-and-reverend-keith-hebden-9274303.html



Just noticed in that article, these food banks started under Labour when they were still pocketing all the tax revenues and living off the Tories' hard work.

The numbers of people using them doubled every year from then on and up to 63,000 in the year they were kicked out and as their economic mayhem was starting to kick in.

One question.

Where were all these Bishops from 2005 to 2010 ? Why weren't they knocking on Blair's or Brown's door asking what the f*ck was going on and asking them to help the poorest in society more ?

Why wait until the Tories/Libs get in and when they are having to pay off billions of debt due to Labour's incompetence ?

So you think that going from 63,000 to 500,000 in 2013 is acceptable then? No level of food banks is acceptable but at 63,000 you are looking at the majority being homeless folk. At 500,000 you are no longer talking homeless theses are people who for one reason or another have been sanctioned.

Labours incompetence I'm taking Banking crisis was started in no. 10 with Gordon Brown and the boys stirring up trouble.

Finally the tory government has added more to the national debt than combined a Labour government in history. They haven't paid anything off only added to it due to the incompetence of there own policies.
 
Mike D said:
CITYBOY1000 said:
Kun Aguero said:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-camerons-constituency-office-calls-police-on-food-bank-campaigners-bishop-of-oxford-and-reverend-keith-hebden-9274303.html



Just noticed in that article, these food banks started under Labour when they were still pocketing all the tax revenues and living off the Tories' hard work.

The numbers of people using them doubled every year from then on and up to 63,000 in the year they were kicked out and as their economic mayhem was starting to kick in.

One question.

Where were all these Bishops from 2005 to 2010 ? Why weren't they knocking on Blair's or Brown's door asking what the f*ck was going on and asking them to help the poorest in society more ?

Why wait until the Tories/Libs get in and when they are having to pay off billions of debt due to Labour's incompetence ?

So you think that going from 63,000 to 500,000 in 2013 is acceptable then? No level of food banks is acceptable but at 63,000 you are looking at the majority being homeless folk. At 500,000 you are no longer talking homeless theses are people who for one reason or another have been sanctioned.

Labours incompetence I'm taking Banking crisis was started in no. 10 with Gordon Brown and the boys stirring up trouble.

Finally the tory government has added more to the national debt than combined a Labour government in history. They haven't paid anything off only added to it due to the incompetence of there own policies.
You are aware that the last statement there is because of the Labour government as well. Its no big surprise that the national debt has rocketed since the financial crisis. Hardly like they are spanking money out for things is it. It will be like this for years now and probably never really come down
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.