CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

So I am currently making my way through the 25pages.
On Page 12 of the full award CAS highlights the following:

CAS - FULL AWARD PAGE 12
  • The failure of UEFA even to investigate these repeated breaches of confidentiality, let alone to take remedial and preventative measures, notwithstanding that the Investigation, adjudication and present arbitration continue (and despite MCFC’s repeated requests for such), casts grave doubt upon the fairness, impartiality and integrity of the IC’s approach.

  • ➢ Furthermore, the IC’s Referral Decision was made improperly and prematurely, in breach of the Procedural Rules, MCFC’s legitimate expectations as to both the substance and procedure of the Investigation, and the IC’s obligations of good faith and due process:
(a) pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Procedural Rules, the IC is empowered inter alia to issue a decision to refer the case to the AC expressly only “[a]t the end of the investigation”. The Referral Decision itself states that the Investigation is still ongoing. The IC acted in breach of the Procedural Rules by issuing the Referral Decision before concluding its Investigation;

Looking forward to finishing this full award, but this is telling from CAS how unfair and bent UEFA were when they were supposedly investigating us.

SHAME ON YOU UEFA, and to all the MEDIA .....DO ONE!!

where is this available please?
 
So I am currently making my way through the 25pages.
On Page 12 of the full award CAS highlights the following:

CAS - FULL AWARD PAGE 12
  • The failure of UEFA even to investigate these repeated breaches of confidentiality, let alone to take remedial and preventative measures, notwithstanding that the Investigation, adjudication and present arbitration continue (and despite MCFC’s repeated requests for such), casts grave doubt upon the fairness, impartiality and integrity of the IC’s approach.

  • ➢ Furthermore, the IC’s Referral Decision was made improperly and prematurely, in breach of the Procedural Rules, MCFC’s legitimate expectations as to both the substance and procedure of the Investigation, and the IC’s obligations of good faith and due process:
(a) pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Procedural Rules, the IC is empowered inter alia to issue a decision to refer the case to the AC expressly only “[a]t the end of the investigation”. The Referral Decision itself states that the Investigation is still ongoing. The IC acted in breach of the Procedural Rules by issuing the Referral Decision before concluding its Investigation;

Looking forward to finishing this full award, but this is telling from CAS how unfair and bent UEFA were when they were supposedly investigating us.

SHAME ON YOU UEFA, and to all the MEDIA .....DO ONE!!

Isn't that from the previous cas appeal in December?
 
So I am currently making my way through the 25pages.
On Page 12 of the full award CAS highlights the following:

CAS - FULL AWARD PAGE 12
  • The failure of UEFA even to investigate these repeated breaches of confidentiality, let alone to take remedial and preventative measures, notwithstanding that the Investigation, adjudication and present arbitration continue (and despite MCFC’s repeated requests for such), casts grave doubt upon the fairness, impartiality and integrity of the IC’s approach.

  • ➢ Furthermore, the IC’s Referral Decision was made improperly and prematurely, in breach of the Procedural Rules, MCFC’s legitimate expectations as to both the substance and procedure of the Investigation, and the IC’s obligations of good faith and due process:
(a) pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Procedural Rules, the IC is empowered inter alia to issue a decision to refer the case to the AC expressly only “[a]t the end of the investigation”. The Referral Decision itself states that the Investigation is still ongoing. The IC acted in breach of the Procedural Rules by issuing the Referral Decision before concluding its Investigation;

Looking forward to finishing this full award, but this is telling from CAS how unfair and bent UEFA were when they were supposedly investigating us.

SHAME ON YOU UEFA, and to all the MEDIA .....DO ONE!!
You are reading the old document fella.
 
So I am currently making my way through the 25pages.
On Page 12 of the full award CAS highlights the following:

CAS - FULL AWARD PAGE 12
  • The failure of UEFA even to investigate these repeated breaches of confidentiality, let alone to take remedial and preventative measures, notwithstanding that the Investigation, adjudication and present arbitration continue (and despite MCFC’s repeated requests for such), casts grave doubt upon the fairness, impartiality and integrity of the IC’s approach.

  • ➢ Furthermore, the IC’s Referral Decision was made improperly and prematurely, in breach of the Procedural Rules, MCFC’s legitimate expectations as to both the substance and procedure of the Investigation, and the IC’s obligations of good faith and due process:
(a) pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Procedural Rules, the IC is empowered inter alia to issue a decision to refer the case to the AC expressly only “[a]t the end of the investigation”. The Referral Decision itself states that the Investigation is still ongoing. The IC acted in breach of the Procedural Rules by issuing the Referral Decision before concluding its Investigation;

Looking forward to finishing this full award, but this is telling from CAS how unfair and bent UEFA were when they were supposedly investigating us.

SHAME ON YOU UEFA, and to all the MEDIA .....DO ONE!!
Why are you quoting the original City appeal?
 
I honestly don't know why people are excited for this. The media will 100% cling on to their time-barred/got off on a technicality stance if there is one single mention of the above in the document (which there will be).
What a strange remark. As a fan, me and I'm sure thousands of others are keen to fully understand the charges, defence and findings.
 
Please except my apology for the above. Read the wrong document. However, when the award is released, will there be a simplified version written up for the semi illiterate like me. thanks again.
Not from CAS no, I dare say the media will prepare one (probably already got it ready) that claims we're guilty regardless.

People are going to be posting the old one all day long, the full award will appear here: https://www.tas-cas.org/en/index.html just keep hitting F%.
 
So I am currently making my way through the 25pages.
On Page 12 of the full award CAS highlights the following:

CAS - FULL AWARD PAGE 12
  • The failure of UEFA even to investigate these repeated breaches of confidentiality, let alone to take remedial and preventative measures, notwithstanding that the Investigation, adjudication and present arbitration continue (and despite MCFC’s repeated requests for such), casts grave doubt upon the fairness, impartiality and integrity of the IC’s approach.

  • ➢ Furthermore, the IC’s Referral Decision was made improperly and prematurely, in breach of the Procedural Rules, MCFC’s legitimate expectations as to both the substance and procedure of the Investigation, and the IC’s obligations of good faith and due process:
(a) pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Procedural Rules, the IC is empowered inter alia to issue a decision to refer the case to the AC expressly only “[a]t the end of the investigation”. The Referral Decision itself states that the Investigation is still ongoing. The IC acted in breach of the Procedural Rules by issuing the Referral Decision before concluding its Investigation;

Looking forward to finishing this full award, but this is telling from CAS how unfair and bent UEFA were when they were supposedly investigating us.

SHAME ON YOU UEFA, and to all the MEDIA .....DO ONE!!
I suspect you're going to feel a right tit in 5,4,3,2,1
 
oh my bad, looks like I went in the last couple of pages on the thread and saw the CAS link posted by one of the members and read that document. And thought this one document is referring to initial CAS appeal in 2019 and the current CAS 2020 decision.
 
The detailed release by CAS has to be approved by both sides does it not, ourselves and uefa.

I cant see that we will allow a decision to be released that will suggest we are guilty still for the media to jump on

And any media outlet or journo who tries to twist any detail to fit their narrative are aware we will not stand for it, so they will do so at their own risk
 
I honestly don't know why people are excited for this. The media will 100% cling on to their time-barred/got off on a technicality stance if there is one single mention of the above in the document (which there will be).
People may actually be more interested in reading the detailed truth rather being bothered about what the media say.
 
7 days ago.

Remember how we all felt. The nerves and tension but tinged with hope. Could we really do it? Then the explosion of joy as we were cleared.

I really hope that someone creates a montage of City fans around the world reacting to the result.

'Look what its done to me. I used to be 6 foot tall with curly hair"
 
I honestly don't know why people are excited for this. The media will 100% cling on to their time-barred/got off on a technicality stance if there is one single mention of the above in the document (which there will be).
Indeed we'll have even paid them off to write a positive report....is there no end to the depths of bribary we'll go to?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top