CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

The Daily United hatchet job. The rag and it’s journalists have been building up to this.

View attachment 21886

The Daily United had the only reporter in court.

Are City finally going to ban this Rag fanzine from the Etihad Once and for all?

You absolute c*nts!
Just a reminder that in April 2011, FFP wasn't in force. It only applied to us in June that year, when the first assessment period started.

Harris must be desperate for cash again.
 
Think we've all had enough of this, where is the consistency?
Why are City the only team being investigated?
Do we need to hire our own hackers to expose the Liverpool and United cheating
They wouldn’t publish it. They weren’t interested in the Liverpool hacking story and have totally brushed the security failures at the Stretford shithole under the carpet
 
There is literally nothing new whatsoever. Harris is just adding a load of innuendo dressed as ‘context’ to flesh out the not very exciting fact that they were the only paper who could be arsed sending a reporter to the high court last week.
Woodward and Bernstein it ain’t
And the PL actually supported us in that case, which was about whether the original judge was right to publish her reasoning about the PL's arbitration process. The PL agreed that they wanted it kept secret, which the appeal judges severely criticised them for. But none of the hacks mention that.
 
Regardless of what we know, Harris and the Daily United are continuing to play into sheep narrative about our owner and City.

United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Spurs, etc fans will love this. Read the comments to come.

Hatchet job done by Harris and the Daily United.

It’s time to sacrifice Samuel, for all his good, and ban the Daily United from the Etihad.
 
One article references an over inflated sponsorship deal with Ethihad in 2011. We were fined after the first reporting period of FFP, which was reduced after we were compliant. EPL FFP didn’t exist during this period, so we cannot have broken their rules.
it really seems like a rehash of a non story.
 
For what it’s worth, Bird & Bird (representing the premier league) are not the firm I would ever turn to for litigation.

IP, maybe. But high stakes litigation, simply no.

City have Freshfields I believe, and now confirmed from the Mail’s articles, Pannick QC. A heavyweight team that, should we have a decent case, I’d entirely trust to pull us through successfully.

The mail’s latest articles are simply dogshit if I’m being blunt. They sent a reporter and they want their time in the spotlight. Nothing new learnt, and they even say that the Portuguese hacker Rui Pinto will give evidence on behalf of the PL under “witness protection”. I mean seriously, that would be a first! A hacker being used for witness evidence in a private non-criminal dispute. What a load of bollocks.
 
The fail must be run by a bunch of dimwits. Rehashing old ground that we have been already cleared from any financial wrongdoing by CAS.

We must be close to buying Kane/JG for this nonsense to start up again.

Made up rules to stop competition is ILLEGAL.
 
Harris, the arrogant c*nt!

He’s baiting on his Twitter page.

I *totally* get the vast majority of Man City fans hate FFP & UEFA. That's fair enough. Like Brexit, fair-minded people can legitimately hold vastly different sincere views. Disagree with me. Ask me Qs. But don't shoot the messenger. XX
 
Time to ban the fail. The racial undertones are clear with every attack. Using a criminal hacker to support mismatched emails is fantastically delusional.
 
For what it’s worth, Bird & Bird (representing the premier league) are not the firm I would ever turn to for litigation.

IP, maybe. But high stakes litigation, simply no.

City have Freshfields I believe, and now confirmed from the Mail’s articles, Pannick QC. A heavyweight team that, should we have a decent case, I’d entirely trust to pull us through successfully.

The mail’s latest articles are simply dogshit if I’m being blunt. They sent a reporter and they want their time in the spotlight. Nothing new learnt, and they even say that the Portuguese hacker Rui Pinto will give evidence on behalf of the PL under “witness protection”. I mean seriously, that would be a first! A hacker being used for witness evidence in a private non-criminal dispute. What a load of bollocks.
The fact the Mail are mentioning the criminal extortionist Pinto as a potential ‘witness’ at all is proof that there is absolutely nothing new whatsoever. No new evidence at all, no smoking gun. It is just a rehash of the same old Football Leaks/Der Spiegel bullshit which has already been discredited and laughed out of an actual court of law. Written and published in bad faith and malice by a deranged individual with an axe to grind
 
One of the funniest parts of the Mail’s coverage is the article about how the court “DISMANTLED our defence” by allowing the judgment to be published.

What Rob Harris is missing is that this was a procedural application which would happen 9 times out of 10 in a private dispute involving sensitive information. You don’t hear about the ones that win. If I’m being honest, and I do hate the negative media attention we get, I honestly doubt City would have cared that much about publication here. There was probably a tactical element, and it’s something you’d “try” anyway (but they were probably alive to the fact it would be published anyway, especially Pannick). What he’s missing more is the fact that the PREMIER LEAGUE also consented to the application, and also didn’t want it to be published.

A blatant misreading of what’s happened, which makes you question any of the other four articles they’ve published tonight. If they really had a “smoking gun”, why dedicate one article to a load of red tinted bollocks, and another saying that Rui Tinto will be spared jail for cooperation under a witness protection programme which INCLUDES helping the premier league in a non criminal private litigation...! Because that’s how our justice system works, we let criminals off if they cooperate to help one company sue another...
 
Last edited:
Hey Nick!

Guess what? Yes, you’ve got us bang to rights on the basis of one email. But guess what else? That email is eight years old, but the Limitation Act says the PL can only challenge us for things that happened in the last six years!!!!!

So your email is worth diddly squat!!!

Doesn’t that make your piss boil??

Never mind! Better luck next time

:) :) :)
 
The cheating narrative will always stain our wonderful club thanks to trial by media whores. They have come at us again and again to tarnish and destroy the reputations of the Abu Dhabi Group and any decent City fan.


Deplorable behaviour by the MSM for financial gain.

The only cheat is this 2 bit hustler and his gargoyle pack…Fuck off.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top