CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
 
Manchester1894 said:
Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
Click to expand...
It's another reflection of the open, true and accurate accounts published - though looking at all the Trafford and Kopite mouth foaming responses they have trouble processing the actual facts.

You have to include any averse potential actions on the horizon to give a full and accurate financial report.
The telling part as pointed out by various, is that there are no provisions made for a negative outcome on it. ie no funds set aside.

Perhaps Kopites would care to examine their last published accounts and look for any indications of warnings that 'they cannot compete' and the potential for FSG selling part/full amounts of their shares - I doubt there is any... which sort of indicates that their accounts are not an accurate reflection of reality, no?
 
Manchester1894 said:
Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
Click to expand...
It was actually also referenced last year - same language. Auditors/Audit Committee would have told them to put it in.
 
JASR said:
It's another reflection of the open, true and accurate accounts published - though looking at all the Trafford and Kopite mouth foaming responses they have trouble processing the actual facts.

You have to include any averse potential actions on the horizon to give a full and accurate financial report.
The telling part as pointed out by various, is that there are no provisions made for a negative outcome on it. ie no funds set aside.

Perhaps Kopites would care to examine their last published accounts and look for any indications of warnings that 'they cannot compete' and the potential for FSG selling part/full amounts of their shares - I doubt there is any... which sort of indicates that their accounts are not an accurate reflection of reality, no?
Click to expand...
Top post fella.
 
Manchester1894 said:
Has anyone seen any opinion on why the club put the PL investigation into the accounts? The Premier League never formally announced it did they? And neither have we. So why now? Are we throwing the PL under a bus that they are not communicating openly and honestly? Are we executing something that later on we can say, we were open about this? Pressure tactic possibly
Click to expand...
I thought it was because the judge decided it was in the public interest to state that there was an investigation ongoing awhile back, against both parties wishes. I wasn't aware that we'd put it in the last accounts though, so it looks like it's just an accounting requirement.
 
twosips said:
Yeah read that thread and it seems dodgy as fuck tbh. Hard to deny that it looks all made up. Would genuinely love it if someone on here could prove otherwise, but it's very suspicious.
Click to expand...

Its not fantastic investigative journalism, a few linkedin profiles and a model from London. You’d like to think that the intelligent people we have at the top wouldn’t leave themselves open to having a bogus sponsor like that.

If you wanted to create bogus companies to pump money in, there are better ways that what’s perceived to be the case here.

So it’s either complete bullshit or amateur hour.
 
twosips said:
Yeah read that thread and it seems dodgy as fuck tbh. Hard to deny that it looks all made up. Would genuinely love it if someone on here could prove otherwise, but it's very suspicious.
Click to expand...
Yeah, read the thread and it sounds dodgy, but visit the website http://www.8xbet.co.uk and you get a website on which you can gamble money on the outcome of the results of sporting competitions that are due to take place at some point in the future.

I look forward to reading Harris's exposé on Liverpool's betting partner 188bet. (Based in the Isle of Man, just like 8xbet, but website not available from England). Or their partnership with French blockchain company Sorare that is currently under investigation.

I look forward to reading Harris's exposé on Manchester United's betting partner HTH. Their website appears to be hosted by the same Sportsbook platform that City's 8xbet use. (https://www.hthbet.co.uk/sportsbook#/prelive).

Or Everton's partnership with stake.com. Or Fulham's with W88. Or Newcastle's with FUN88. Or the benefits Liverpool, Spurs and others gained from their deals with 1xBet, before the company was suspended for advertising illegal streaming sites and offering bets on illegal activity such as animal fighting.
 
Paladin said:
Yeah, read the thread and it sounds dodgy, but visit the website http://www.8xbet.co.uk and you get a website on which you can gamble money on the outcome of the results of sporting competitions that are due to take place at some point in the future.

I look forward to reading Harris's exposé on Liverpool's betting partner 188bet. (Based in the Isle of Man, just like 8xbet, but website not available from England). Or their partnership with French blockchain company Sorare that is currently under investigation.

I look forward to reading Harris's exposé on Manchester United's betting partner HTH. Their website appears to be hosted by the same Sportsbook platform that City's 8xbet use. (https://www.hthbet.co.uk/sportsbook#/prelive).

Or Everton's partnership with stake.com. Or Fulham's with W88. Or Newcastle's with FUN88. Or the benefits Liverpool, Spurs and others gained from their deals with 1xBet, before the company was suspended for advertising illegal streaming sites and offering bets on illegal activity such as animal fighting.
Click to expand...
I think you will be waiting a long time.

Edit used a bit of your post to reply to Harris, Elon has unbanned me from Twitter, Harris had me blocked last time, I'll see how long I last this time lol
 
Last edited:
Sounds to me like the betting companies are dodgy and not the clubs who are sponsored by them. Obviously, Harris will see it differently because he hates us so much but if he bothered to do his research, he’d find lots of examples of this involving lots of different clubs.
 
M18CTID said:
Sounds to me like the betting companies are dodgy and not the clubs who are sponsored by them. Obviously, Harris will see it differently because he hates us so much but if he bothered to do his research, he’d find lots of examples of this involving lots of different clubs.
Click to expand...

He's blocked me for calling him out before, but I am guessing this piece of "investigative journalism" involves looking for linked-in profiles and googling names?

#Investigationsfromourbedroomsrus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top