It was clearly offside?Leipzig should have been 3 up early on and wtf was wrong with that goal? Never off side...VARl Madrid yet again.. disgraceful..Leipzig battered them..City would have put 6 past them
Leipzig should have been 3 up early on and wtf was wrong with that goal? Never off side...VARl Madrid yet again.. disgraceful..Leipzig battered them..City would have put 6 past them
It was clearly offside?
Have you seen it? The player in the offside position is holding the keepers arms behind his back!I heard an the supposed VAR review explanation for the " offside " goal
The player who scored was not in an offside position.
However, another player was deemed to be impeding the keeper and he was in an offside position
Bad decision by VAR methinks
That still makes it look way worse than it was.Have you seen it? The player in the offside position is holding the keepers arms behind his back!
Doesn't matter how bad it is, if a player has hold off a keeper in an offside position its offside. There isn't any ambiguity there as he clearly impedes the keeper.That still makes it look way worse than it was.
He's always had it in him to be fair.Just seen the goal from Brahim Diaz. Wow that was special. Messi would be proud of that.
But it should be for a foul thenDoesn't matter how bad it is, if a player has hold off a keeper in an offside position its offside. There isn't any ambiguity there as he clearly impedes the keeper.
An offence is committed against a player in an offside position who is already playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the offside offence is penalised as it has occurred before the foul challengeBut it should be for a foul then