Charlie Adam

Think Liverpool will look to move him on. He's not good enough for the bad press he brings.
 
Mike N said:
Think Liverpool will look to move him on. He's not good enough for the bad press he brings.

Somehow don't think Liverpool's image is going to be damaged by a bad tackler.

Massive racism scandal
 
Lancet Fluke said:
Nasty little bastard. The most irritating thing about him though is that for some reason refs seem to think he is virtually unbookable. He seems to get about 5 or 6 freebies before a ref pulls him up. A bit like Davies at Bolton and Savage used to be the same. It sometimes seems like the dirtier a player is the more leeway they get.


Schoolboy error. The Ginger Pig should be in that list (and i dont mean bb.2)
 
DTKOAG said:
Whats all this previous between Bale & Adams ?
Bale- young, fast, strong, talented, on a decent contract, probably nails some fit birds despite his ears
Adam- older, slower, weaker, shitter, prob on less money, ugly as fuck and probably has never nailed a fit bird despite his bank balance.
 
The_mace said:
Mike N said:
Think Liverpool will look to move him on. He's not good enough for the bad press he brings.

Somehow don't think Liverpool's image is going to be damaged by a bad tackler.

Massive racism scandal


I disagree. After what happened last year, Liverpool will not want any more bad press. Liverpool continue to be a very prestigious club and do not need any more bad publicity.

Mark my words, Rogers will get rid.
 
spurspinter1 said:
blueandy1mac said:
Err..... I really can't see what the problem is.

Bale told team GB he was injured.

Team GB accepted his and Tottenhams word.

Bale somehow found himself fit and well and playing in a very important friendly, before team GB played.

Bale got injured.

Seems like poetic justice to me.

(I do'nt condone violent challenges)

Jesus Wept

The Club considers the recent comment and accusations regarding Gareth Bale's fitness relating to his non selection for Team GB's men's football team to be wholly unacceptable and unjustified.

For the avoidance of any doubt and on a point of absolute clarity and transparency - Gareth sustained an injury as he built up his fitness ahead of joining up with Stuart Pearce's side. MRI scan reports were sent to the FA medical team on 29 June (2012).

He was subsequently not selected on the basis of this injury and the inability to predict recovery time.

This decision was not taken lightly and made only after consultation with Team GB's medical team, who were in agreement after seeing the medical reports.

At no time was Gareth made unavailable for selection. Indeed, Gareth made clear publicly on numerous occasions his desire to compete for Team GB and was extremely disappointed on hearing the news he would not be fit to participate.

He is now focused on and determined to get fit for the season ahead and to this end we have brought out an additional member of our medical team on tour, dedicated to Gareth's recovery.

We are dismayed that some have sought to make wrongful assumptions about Gareth's particular situation and that such positive news surrounding his recovery is being highlighted in this manner. We trust that this statement now clarifies this matter once and for all.


Poetic Justice? Wise up.

Maybe I'll 'wise up' when the likes of Bale and Giggs (serial offender) and numerous others stop abusing the call up system. Their clubs supply all the medical evidence required to excuse them International duty, then miraculously they make a rapid recovery enabling them to play for the team that supplied all the 'evidence'.
Call me a cynic but after the first 50 times you see it happen, you lose faith.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.