Charlie Kirk shot dead at Utah university

journolud said:
could someone summarise it?
Click to expand...
The story that he was shot in the neck from the front is not consistent with the forensic evidence. He was shot in the side/back of the head from behind.
The video of “the shooter” escaping across the roof does not look genuine, e.g. his shadow disappears, a person in the background disappears.
 
KS55 said:
The story that he was shot in the neck from the front is not consistent with the forensic evidence. He was shot in the side/back of the head from behind.
The video of “the shooter” escaping across the roof does not look genuine, e.g. his shadow disappears, a person in the background disappears.
Click to expand...
Was there a grassy knoll behind Kirk?
 
state of these people. Can't we just quietly back out of the door and lock them in their conspiracy room?

 
I watched a video yesterday which showed the guy asking Kirk just as he was shot, I swear blind you can hear two gunshots.
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Still questions being asked on the assassination:

Click to expand...

"Why is no-one checking the roof? Don't they have a drone?"

I would guess because Charlie Kirk was a nobody in the grand scheme of things, so wasn't turning up to campuses with an entourage of presidential-level security. It'd be like checking the roofs for snipers when Tommy Robinson did an address at the Oxford Union.
 
I have a question or two…

Why take such an old rifle?
Did the rifle really need assembling and disassembling?
Did he really leave his screwdriver up there?
If he took up a disassembled rifle, assembled it, took the shot, then disassembled it to escape (he certainly didn’t look to be jumping off the roof and escaping with a long gun), why (or how) did he leave the gun fully assembled in a grassy ditch, wrapped in a towel, with a plan to return and pick it up???

In short, WTF was he thinking and why all the work to be surreptitious and then leave all the evidence lying around inside the murder search area???

Someone definitely took a shot and it tore his neck open, whether directly or as a ricochet from the top of his breastplate, instantly killing him in public. Whether it was this kid, with the gun they say, it APPEARS so, but there are questions that need answering.
 
ChicagoBlue said:
I have a question or two…

Why take such an old rifle?
Did the rifle really need assembling and disassembling?
Did he really leave his screwdriver up there?
If he took up a disassembled rifle, assembled it, took the shot, then disassembled it to escape (he certainly didn’t look to be jumping off the roof and escaping with a long gun), why (or how) did he leave the gun fully assembled in a grassy ditch, wrapped in a towel, with a plan to return and pick it up???

In short, WTF was he thinking and why all the work to be surreptitious and then leave all the evidence lying around inside the murder search area???

Someone definitely took a shot and it tore his neck open, whether directly or as a ricochet from the top of his breastplate, instantly killing him in public. Whether it was this kid, with the gun they say, it APPEARS so, but there are questions that need answering.
Click to expand...
Yep. The kid now denies being the shooter. More questions than answers.
 
Have a lookin YouTube lots of hunters out there questioning where he was shot from, they are saying he was shot through the back of his head due to the exit wound which would mean the guy they got didn’t do it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top