Cheating Refs

Blue Mooner said:
If you contrast the penalties we didn't get against Liverpool ie the Dzeko and Silva claims (not even including the Skrtel handball which was as blatant as you can get) versus the one that Liverpool 'did' get a week earlier against West Ham and tell me which were the more likely penalties ?

Okay different ref, a week earlier, but if you give the Flanagan penalty then Dzeko and Silva are penalties all day long.

Now it's not an exact science to say that had we got either penalties we would have got the draw but no doubt it would have helped (particularly skrtel's being in the last minute) then the delta in points is massive.

There was only 20 mins left against west ham and west ham looked comfortable, I was getting confident they were going to falter then boom, penalty, if it hadn't been Flanagan, it would have been Suarez, Mark my words.

Had decisions been given consistently ie West Ham not a penalty we would have been 5 points behind meaning you would have a marginally better case to say Dzeko and silva weren't penalties.

Conversely, had we been given a penalty decision as Liverpool were against west ham then we still would have been 4 points behind with two games in hand.

Had all decisions been given correctly, we would in all likelihood only be 2 points behind with 2 games in hand.

Critically, the title would still be in our hands. Ok, I accept you can go back on lots of decisions through the season and say if this or if that, however, we are now at the business end of the season, the title is within sight and crucial decisions are suddenly going against us.

This is the rag syndrome, rags are too far behind so it's Liverpools turn to keep the profile of the premier league and global fan bases happy. It stinks, it truly does.


It Liverpools' year as soon as the FA and their refs knew they were challenging for the title. Let's be honest, 25 anniversary of Hillsborough, Steven Gerrard never won a title ... it's all too good a story to not let it happen. It will happen. To me that's as clear as why Clattenburg would never want to be in the spotlight for spoiling the fairytale. I can live with the penalty descisions, just, but Suarez not getting a second yellow, therefore a red was as blatant as it good be. Yet Clattenburg realized the consequences on the day and the next week or so.
 
de niro said:
Begbie said:
Corruption thoughts aside, what I DO find incredible is the commentary after stating that clattenburg had a 'great game'. His ineptitude, whatever it was down to, definately cost us that game. It also may have cost us the title.

You can argue that our own mistakes and or general play was the difference but would we have played differently if we had a fair crack at the whip on a level playing field? Cheat, bottler, corrupt, insert as applicable but that bastard cost us dear and the most sickening thing is that the dippers know it too.

he was appointed for the reasons you list. he is not working alone.

Why didn't he give two penalties to Liverpool? Why didn't he just give a free-kick against MDM when Suarez took a tumble?

It clearly wasn't a bent performance in the way you're talking but he bottled it and cheated us out of a victory and for that he should be punished. But he isn't, and the consensus around the media is that he did a good job. I think it's more a case of what someone on here said the other day, that the ref's don't want to fuck up so they more or less duck out of the biggest decisions. Unacceptable, but plausible.
 
The cookie monster said:
de niro said:
Begbie said:
Corruption thoughts aside, what I DO find incredible is the commentary after stating that clattenburg had a 'great game'. His ineptitude, whatever it was down to, definately cost us that game. It also may have cost us the title.

You can argue that our own mistakes and or general play was the difference but would we have played differently if we had a fair crack at the whip on a level playing field? Cheat, bottler, corrupt, insert as applicable but that bastard cost us dear and the most sickening thing is that the dippers know it too.

he was appointed for the reasons you list. he is not working alone.
Who's pulling his strings then?

The world is out to get Man City. Come on TCM, you should know that by now.
 
NorthEastScotlandMCFC said:
Pellegrini is too nice, shit approach, we should have been highlighting referee decisions weeks ago.

Gutted

Fair play Pellegrini

The referees have been terrible so far this season
 
NorthEastScotlandMCFC said:
NorthEastScotlandMCFC said:
Pellegrini is too nice, shit approach, we should have been highlighting referee decisions weeks ago.

Gutted

Fair play Pellegrini

The referees have been terrible so far this season

and they won't be getting any better, aside from the odd OK performance
 
We will get another sh** referee in the champions league .
I can think of number of clowns we have had .
We got stitched up against Ajax , Barcelona ,and Bayern Munich away in 2011 ,
In the Europa league against Dynamo Kiev at home in 2011 .
Always feel like where facing 12 men when where in Europe .
 
eversince 76 said:
Blue Mooner said:
If you contrast the penalties we didn't get against Liverpool ie the Dzeko and Silva claims (not even including the Skrtel handball which was as blatant as you can get) versus the one that Liverpool 'did' get a week earlier against West Ham and tell me which were the more likely penalties ?

Okay different ref, a week earlier, but if you give the Flanagan penalty then Dzeko and Silva are penalties all day long.

Now it's not an exact science to say that had we got either penalties we would have got the draw but no doubt it would have helped (particularly skrtel's being in the last minute) then the delta in points is massive.

There was only 20 mins left against west ham and west ham looked comfortable, I was getting confident they were going to falter then boom, penalty, if it hadn't been Flanagan, it would have been Suarez, Mark my words.

Had decisions been given consistently ie West Ham not a penalty we would have been 5 points behind meaning you would have a marginally better case to say Dzeko and silva weren't penalties.

Conversely, had we been given a penalty decision as Liverpool were against west ham then we still would have been 4 points behind with two games in hand.

Had all decisions been given correctly, we would in all likelihood only be 2 points behind with 2 games in hand.

Critically, the title would still be in our hands. Ok, I accept you can go back on lots of decisions through the season and say if this or if that, however, we are now at the business end of the season, the title is within sight and crucial decisions are suddenly going against us.

This is the rag syndrome, rags are too far behind so it's Liverpools turn to keep the profile of the premier league and global fan bases happy. It stinks, it truly does.


It Liverpools' year as soon as the FA and their refs knew they were challenging for the title. Let's be honest, 25 anniversary of Hillsborough, Steven Gerrard never won a title ... it's all too good a story to not let it happen. It will happen. To me that's as clear as why Clattenburg would never want to be in the spotlight for spoiling the fairytale. I can live with the penalty descisions, just, but Suarez not getting a second yellow, therefore a red was as blatant as it good be. Yet Clattenburg realized the consequences on the day and the next week or so.

Think how Norwich feel. Clattenburg had 3 opportunities to give Suarez a second yellow due to the fact he didn't he was allowed to play the week after at Norwich.

It would have been a different story with Liverpool having no strikers at Norwich and them fighting tooth and nail to stay up. It might have even kick started there survival though highly unlikely considering the games they had. Nevertheless a decision by not sending Suarez off had consequences on other clubs.
 
baildon blue said:
We will get another sh** referee in the champions league .
I can think of number of clowns we have had .
We got stitched up against Ajax , Barcelona ,and Bayern Munich away in 2011 ,
In the Europa league against Dynamo Kiev at home in 2011 .
Always feel like where facing 12 men when where in Europe .

I agree with you.

Although we don't do ourselves any favours. For example Twatenberg was awful in the Arsenal game as has been pointed out elsewhere.

But the fact of the matter, Edin had two guilt opportunities to win the game in the last 5 minutes. Edin missed twice and we only drew.

But as I said I agree with you, it does feel like we are playing 12 men at times.
 
Another shit referee performance

Should have had two pens and ref booked our players on first challenges.

This is happening far too often for it to be coincidence.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.