sir baconface
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't read too much into the retrial decision. A barrister friend I was talking to recently told me that the CPS are sending rape/sexual assault cases for trial on the flimsiest prosecution evidence, which is well below the threshold they would apply to other cases not involving sexual offences.
So in other words it's a political decision that they will actively pursue cases of this nature even if they don't seriously believe there's a possibility of a conviction, just so that they can say they're taking rape accusations more seriously.
Given Evans' profile, a retrial was always going to be on the cards.
Not entirely surprising but I do hope your friend is wrong because that would serve absolutely nobody's interests.
On the Evans case, given the original verdict, the CPS might well have had had reasonable grounds for expecting a 50% chance of conviction. (Even though now overturned.) I believe 50% is their normal yardstick although I could be wrong.