Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

[Feed-The-Goat]

Re: £73.5m

it looks that way, i dont even seem bothered about it tbh, if they get him then i couldnt give a shit.

he could turn out to be a very expensive flop, no one knows and i glad we aint the ones testing that

 

[Shooter 83]

Re: kaka

yeah but i wouldnt worry all to much man. to the best of my knowldge city have said tell us their off an we will better it.
dunno if this is true just what someone has said to me. but if thats the case then should he come to an english club. its gonna be us...!

I think we should throw in a bid to see what happens then pull out at the last minute just to piss them off like they did with us.

I like it.

 

[Anonymous]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Kaka is a player who would add great value to any squad, especially ours. So based on that, if the owners and manager feel they need him, and feel they can convince him to come to us, then they will go after him...

However, if he doesn't come to us, I'd rather he go to Chelski than to Madrid simply because I'd love to see him in the premiership...

 

[interisti]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

This is crazy !!! Seriously........

 

[piffy on a rock bun]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Stay out of it, he has had his chance & anyway we have superman!

 

[Balti]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

That's just plain obscene.They are ruining football. Again.

 

[bluestud]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Now sit back and wait for the 'storm' of indignation from the media at this obscene amount of money that will destroy 'our beautiful game'.

Or maybe not.

Can someone with time on their hands cross reference what individual journalists now say in contrast to our 'disgraceful' actions when we tried to sign him?

Then we can name and shame and bombard the hypocrites with emails!!

 

[Thanx4Knives]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

The Ruin of Football

What do they Kaka for when they'll have studge?

 

[allblues09]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

This might be an ominous sign, but SSN interviewed Hughes on a golf course today.
The last time I can remember that happening we signed Robinho later in the night.

 

[davelyncooper]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Numptyheads...........signing Kaka has f**k all to do with what he does on the pitch......its all about global branding and he is the one our Sheik wants

 

[Manford]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Why spend £100m on a player who doesn't want to play for us?


Concentrate on signing top class players such as Tevez, who actually might want to play for us.

 

[Bowers]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

The're just ruining football. Where they getting the money from?

 

[Goater666]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Chelsea release a statement saying its not true.

Anyone else getting deja vu?

 

[sam the drummer]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

How odd

 

[FORZA CITY]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Why spend £100m on a player who doesn't want to play for us?


Concentrate on signing top class players such as Tevez, who actually might want to play for us.

Sense. ^^^^^

 

[allan harper]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Fucking hell what a circus, think cook was right after all, this millan lot are a bunch of clowns. bored of it now. Hopefully he will sign for someone soon just to bring an end to this madness.

 

[seventeen hands]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

That's, due to the obscene amount of money offered by chelsea, i can confirm they have officially 'ruined football'. No more games will be played forever, after the end of football has come about.

 

[BurnCK]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Id rather have Pato at a third of that price......he's the next Kaka !!

 

[BurnCK]

Re: Chelsea bid £73.5m for Kaka

Chelsea have now denied making such a bid.........f*cking media. Im not believing anymore speculation this summer until I see the player holding his clubs new shirt !