Chelsea Thread (2015-16)

[andyhinch]

Here's how the match report starts on Chelsea's website.

"A Ramires goal incorrectly ruled out for offside with Man City a goal ahead changed the complexion of this early-season Premier League fixture."

We got lucky mate, same as always :)

 

[aguero93:20]

Here's how the match report starts on Chelsea's website.

"A Ramires goal incorrectly ruled out for offside with Man City a goal ahead changed the complexion of this early-season Premier League fixture."

I'm pretty sure he was onside. I'm also pretty sure it changed neither the complexion or the result.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Moureens after match comments just about summed up the guy , he very much reminds me of the GPC , absolutely no humility and we all know what GPC did when the rags realised we are the real deal , he rode off into the sunset.

 

[quiet_riot]

Here's how the match report starts on Chelsea's website.

"A Ramires goal incorrectly ruled out for offside with Man City a goal ahead changed the complexion of this early-season Premier League fixture."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Cocks.

 

[SWP's back]

I'm pretty sure he was onside. I'm also pretty sure it changed neither the complexion or the result.

Bein Soort looked at it and it was offside by about two yards.

 

[jimharri]

 

[aguero93:20]

Bein Soort looked at it and it was offside by about two yards.

Did they? Thought Sagna played him on. Ah well, it would have been nice after a couple of 'decisions' in the two games last year.

 

[jimharri]

Did they? Thought Sagna played him on. Ah well, it would have been nice after a couple of 'decisions' in the two games last year.

He was offside. Not by much, granted. But you can't be "a little bit offside"; you're either onside or you're not.

 

[blueincy]

Just found this miles offside..

 

[Bluewonder]

Just found this miles offside..

Thanks for clearing that one up, mate.