China the home of football

He didnt, he said:
".....China, and the home of football England...."
This was when thanking the bids of all the teams.
 
I heard the China comment and thought that sums up the mood in Fifa especially while that CNUT is in charge. He hates England did feck all about technology re Lampards goal and persists to taking every opportunity to diss England. Hi is a total "Tā mā de húndàn" as they would say in the country that invented football, an utter "piz'da" as they would say in the country that beat us to the world cup, he deserves "Elif air ab tizak" as they say in the arabic speaking country that is hosting 2022 world cup!!
 
not my fault! said:
He didnt, he said:
".....China, and the home of football England...."
This was when thanking the bids of all the teams.

Not that it really matters but this is exactly what he said:

"...originated in China but has been organised in Great Britain, specifically in England and Scotland, and then has spread around the world..."

He may have also referred to the 'home of football' at some other point.
 
Sepp blatter deserves a slow, horrible death. I hope the yacht the Russians bought him off with sinks, a shark chews both of his legs off, and he struggles to stay afloat before slowly drowning to death. ****!
 
nijinskybell said:
greenie said:
Didn't hear that, do you expect anything less from this pillar of democracy and fair play?

----------
This is FIFA's own 'History of Football' from their web page:

The contemporary history of the world's favourite game spans more than 100 years. It all began in 1863 in England, when rugby football and association football branched off on their different courses and the Football Association in England was formed - becoming the sport's first governing body.

Both codes stemmed from a common root and both have a long and intricately branched ancestral tree. A search down the centuries reveals at least half a dozen different games, varying to different degrees, and to which the historical development of football has been traced back. Whether this can be justified in some instances is disputable. Nevertheless, the fact remains that people have enjoyed kicking a ball about for thousands of years and there is absolutely no reason to consider it an aberration of the more 'natural' form of playing a ball with the hands.

On the contrary, apart from the need to employ the legs and feet in tough tussles for the ball, often without any laws for protection, it was recognised right at the outset that the art of controlling the ball with the feet was not easy and, as such, required no small measure of skill. The very earliest form of the game for which there is scientific evidence was an exercise from a military manual dating back to the second and third centuries BC in China.

This Han Dynasty forebear of football was called Tsu' Chu and it consisted of kicking a leather ball filled with feathers and hair through an opening, measuring only 30-40cm in width, into a small net fixed onto long bamboo canes. According to one variation of this exercise, the player was not permitted to aim at his target unimpeded, but had to use his feet, chest, back and shoulders while trying to withstand the attacks of his opponents. Use of the hands was not permitted.

Another form of the game, also originating from the Far East, was the Japanese Kemari, which began some 500-600 years later and is still played today. This is a sport lacking the competitive element of Tsu' Chu with no struggle for possession involved. Standing in a circle, the players had to pass the ball to each other, in a relatively small space, trying not to let it touch the ground.

The Greek 'Episkyros' - of which few concrete details survive - was much livelier, as was the Roman 'Harpastum'. The latter was played out with a smaller ball by two teams on a rectangular field marked by boundary lines and a centre line. The objective was to get the ball over the opposition's boundary lines and as players passed it between themselves, trickery was the order of the day. The game remained popular for 700-800 years, but, although the Romans took it to Britain with them, the use of feet was so small as to scarcely be of consequence.

----------
Rather surprisingly, there are no severed heads mentioned!

That's because there is no evidence that "severed heads" were ever involved. That's just a myth started I suspect by people with no knowledge of the real facts. OTOH, I have read several times that when the Anglo-Saxons and Vikings were fighting each other, they did kick severed heads of the enemy around. But I suspect there's no real evidence for that either.

It's rather frightening the amount of unsubstantiated myth which people seem to believe as fact!

Anyway, agree with most of what has been said about the corrupt nature of FIFA, which also involves UEFA and to some extent our own FA.

I wonder how those teams comprising largely and completely of blacks are going to be welcomed in Russia. And if Israel qualify for the finals, will they be allowed into Qatar?
 
LoveCity said:
Sepp blatter deserves a slow, horrible death. I hope the yacht the Russians bought him off with sinks, a shark chews both of his legs off, and he struggles to stay afloat before slowly drowning to death. ****!

Now thats imagination
 
everyone knows football was invented in britain i dont know why they try and tell people otherwise. the chinese can stick to ping pong.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.