Chloe Ash

[Damocles]

Yes, no matter who filmed it the content is illegal. Which means the person who leaked it could find themselves in pretty serious shit, as I've said. It could mean she has a case to answer herself for making the video, but I'm not sure about that.

There are a few cases of girls filming themselves, sending videos to their boyfriends and the girls getting arrested for distribution of child pornography and been put on the Sex Offenders Register

That's absolutely ridiculous.

Read this.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/27/earlyshow/main4896577.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/ ... 6577.shtml</a>

 

[MCFCinUSA]

There are a few cases of girls filming themselves, sending videos to their boyfriends and the girls getting arrested for distribution of child pornography and been put on the Sex Offenders Register

That's absolutely ridiculous.

Read this.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/27/earlyshow/main4896577.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/ ... 6577.shtml</a>

it begs the question of how do you treat family baby photos, which everyone has.

perhaps the big thing the law is missing is the mind and intent of who is 'distributing' these things, and whether there is an element of self-promotion as opposed to what I imagine goes on with child pornography, which is a very serious issue.

quite often 'the law is an arse' or as the Americans understand it, a donkey (ass)

America is of course highly puritanical in certain ways, and completely backward in its usual hysterical response to 'issues' like Arnold Schwarzenegger's recently revealed dalliance and Senator Wiener's wiener. In the latter case I'm not referring so much to this guy's laughable behaviour, but the uproar created when it transpired after the original revelations he exchanged a handful of private messages (of absolutely no questionable content) to a 17 year-old woman who initiated contact with him after seeing him speak at her school. Yeah, you can imagine how that went down here.. things are totally ridiculous in the United States when an adult male (for whatever reasons) cannot receive and send normal text messages with a woman because she's 17 years-old.

the lunatics really are running the asylum, ehehe

 

[SWP's back]

That's absolutely ridiculous.

Read this.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/27/earlyshow/main4896577.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/ ... 6577.shtml</a>

it begs the question of how do you treat family baby photos, which everyone has.

perhaps the big thing the law is missing is the mind and intent of who is 'distributing' these things, and whether there is an element of self-promotion as opposed to what I imagine goes on with child pornography, which is a very serious issue.

quite often 'the law is an arse' or as the Americans understand it, a donkey (ass)

America is of course highly puritanical in certain ways, and completely backward in its usual hysterical response to 'issues' like Arnold Schwarzenegger's recently revealed dalliance and Senator Wiener's wiener. In the latter case I'm not referring so much to this guy's laughable behaviour, but the uproar created when it transpired after the original revelations he exchanged a handful of private messages (of absolutely no questionable content) to a 17 year-old woman who initiated contact with him after seeing him speak at her school. Yeah, you can imagine how that went down here.. things are totally ridiculous in the United States when an adult male (for whatever reasons) cannot receive and send normal text messages with a woman because she's 17 years-old.

the lunatics really are running the asylum, ehehe

Yet the US porn industry out gross's Hollywood year on year.

It just don't make sense govnor.

 

[GStar]

There are a few cases of girls filming themselves, sending videos to their boyfriends and the girls getting arrested for distribution of child pornography and been put on the Sex Offenders Register

That's absolutely ridiculous.

Read this.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/27/earlyshow/main4896577.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/ ... 6577.shtml</a>

I'm hoping that, that's part of the US claim culture trend.

If not the prosecutor is a complete whopper. (I like the irony that one of them is named Marrisa Miller)

 

[2Forward]

A pretty sad case this really, until i moved away to newcastle i used to hang around with her, she wasn't the nicest girl, but she wasn't exactly horrible. And i think it's all going over the top with the way people are acting about it now. She's 17 and she's even coming up on google searches, its really grim when you see people going on asking for the link as well

 

[Blue Smarties]

Before you jump to defending her get your facts right.
1. she sent the video to a few people, none of which were her boyfriend, so she effectively exposed herself, the guy she sent it to had only started speeking to her that night aswell and wasn't being a 'flirt' etc the only reason he posted it was over what I will go over in point 2.
2. The person who's face she laughed in is a kemo patient(can't spell) who comes from congelton who is friends with the person who posted it on the website tumblr.
3. As someone has already highlighted with the post of an image where she made comments of cotdeath about someones newborn, showing that the cancer comment wasn't a one off.

Whilst I'm not saying what happened was right, what I am doing is stating the facts as I know most of the people intially involved well. Personally I think posting it was to far as she was already widely in the area disliked over her actions generally before the video was uploaded.

And it goes on

 

[lee-mcfc]

are people STILL going on about this..? jheez