No. What is this “lighting” you refer to?Never heard of lighting?
No. What is this “lighting” you refer to?
Whaaaat!! This season’s third kit is a masterpiece compared to next season’s aberration. Quite what puma were thinking is anyone’s guess.It doesn't look as bad in the pictures someone is wearing it, but its not a nice kit.
I saw a mock up of this kit for PES (I think) where the paisley design was tonal and it looked pretty smart. This is a disaster but not quite as bad as our 3rd kit this season!
Agreed. I genuinely think all 3 are up there with the worst kits we have ever had, and we've had some shockers.I don't like any of the new kits. No idea why Puma gets this so wrong.
Well I never. Could it be possible that I read your initial reply in bad lighting and it looked to me like a patronising post from a thundercunt when in fact you didn’t mean it the way it came across?I’m not sure if you’re joking, so I will assume you’re not. Light is an electromagnetic radiation, and our eyes can perceive a specific range of wavelengths. Surfaces can absorb or reflect this radiation, and depending on which wavelength is reflected we perceive it as colour. The source of this radiation (light) produces varying types of wavelengths. Therefore if you can not match the exact lighting in an image, you will get an alteration of the colour of the object. Hence why lighting can be one of the reasons why the shirts can be perceived as different when in fact they are the exact same material.
I’m not sure if you’re joking, so I will assume you’re not. Light is an electromagnetic radiation, and our eyes can perceive a specific range of wavelengths. Surfaces can absorb or reflect this radiation, and depending on which wavelength is reflected we perceive it as colour. The source of this radiation (light) produces varying types of wavelengths. Therefore if you can not match the exact lighting in an image, you will get an alteration of the colour of the object. Hence why lighting can be one of the reasons why the shirts can be perceived as different when in fact they are the exact same material.
Well I never. Could it be possible that I read your initial reply in bad lighting and it looked to me like a patronising post from a thundercunt when in fact you didn’t mean it the way it came across?
What a dick.Not my fault you wouldn’t understand how light works in the first place.