City’s New Kits - 2020/21 - [Old Thread]

Etihad in dark print looks shit, i know well the legibiljty arguement but that dont help the white puma's on the shoulders to conform with the black one front of shirt...any sky blue shirt with white etihad looks a better aesthetic...
 
nmc said:
Shows how far we’ve sunk and how Nike and Puma have managed our expectations. We are now grateful for a mere blue shirt and white shorts, the absence of purple or black etc. Personally I think all three shirts are abysmal and I wouldn’t be seen dead in any of them. Puma pay the club a substantial fee - so that makes up for it but I honestly think Kits of the standard Umbro produced around 2010/11 would sell so much better than this template tat. I’m at the age where I rarely wear football shirts but I’d like us to have a home kit that reflects our history, respects our traditions and is something to be proud of. That home kit ticks none of the boxes for me.
Click to expand...
The problem with that is as fans we'd pick the same kit every time. They need to do something different to sell them - the morals of that is a different story of course. I'd be happy if we wore the 09/10 umbro kit forever more.
 
blueparrot said:
They look nothing like real playing shorts. Can’t believe the panic over something so obviously wrong. We won’t be wearing navy shorts
Click to expand...

it just looks wrong!

andy-cole-manchester-city-fc-the-britania-stadium-stoke-england-01-JE6CXD.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.