Blue Theatre
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 1,706
Seems like a big mistake, given we want to grow the appeal of City & the fan base ... and not everyone can attend games or afford Sky, etc.
It's funny when you think , utd,Liverpool and Chelsea have got their own TV channels, yet City persist with City+ !
And to think, with the stuff that they could show , ie EDS, Academy, Women's games , plus stuff from the City group teams.Surely enough stuff there to fill a TV Channel !
Fair play to our neighbours for allowing the recent tunnel cam footage to be shown along with every other PL team bar dipperpool who this season didn’tIs it just me or has our media stuff really dropped off over the last couple of months? There hasn't been an Inside City for over a month, no tunnel cams and 6 months on there's no sign of the documentary from last year.
I'd pay for City+ but at the moment there is little reason to unless you want to watch match replays. The club is really behind on this imo.
It’s 2024.
More people watch YouTube than watch TV.
A City TV channel would be an archaic throwback to the 90s. Probably why the rags and dippers have them.
"These days we are saturated with football"These days we are saturated with football, what we don't really need is more and more of it. Like you say om youtbube you can search without having the constraints of an actual channel.
When we play at home the giddy CBBC presenters could be fucked off and news about injuries and feel good interviews with the players and staff could fill the void.
If they've got a few minutes spare not trying to tell you how not to be a scumbag that is.