andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Could our briefs not start talking to them about a malicious prosecution suit now we have FIFA's approval ?
It may, like in your case cause inconvenience, but there is nothing wrong with rules protecting children 10 years old being sold to unscrupulous clubs on the other side of the world.FIFA are a fucking joke at all levels. My lad plays in an under 10's side. One of the boys has lived overseas for a couple of years and it has taken seven weeks for him to be granted international clearance to play in an under 10s game, and there was over 20 documents that his dad had to provide for this to happen, fucking incredible, bureaucracy out of control
Not sure if this is now needed but FIFA statement included
http://www.mcfcwatch.com/2016/09/23...of-any-wrongdoing-in-benjamin-garre-transfer/
We are talking about an English lad whose family worked and lived overseas for two years who now needs international fucking clearance to play in a kids team, how is that necessary or sensible? They aren't even in a league, fucking daftIt may, like in your case cause inconvenience, but there is nothing wrong with rules protecting children 10 years old being sold to unscrupulous clubs on the other side of the world.
Because it's much easier to have a simple rule, than have a rule full of exemptions and possible loopholes. If the odd English family have to fill out some forms and it protects one 10 year old South American orr African being sold against his best interests, for me it's no big deal.We are talking about an English lad whose family worked and lived overseas for two years who now needs international fucking clearance to play in a kids team, how is that necessary or sensible? They aren't even in a league, fucking daft
You don't get it do you? Two months a 10 year old can't play football with his mates because of red tape, we aren't talking about an academy we are talking about a kids local junior team, as I said fucking daftBecause it's much easier to have a simple rule, than have a rule full of exemptions and possible loopholes. If the odd English family have to fill out some forms and it protects one 10 year old South American orr African being sold against his best interests, for me it's no big deal.
But still no one has answered the important question. Why does this keep getting re-hashed by the media ? Is it because we
a) Don't play in red
b) Don't have Gill in a position of power to support us
c) The media are all c*nts.
Twice this has reared its ugly head. It was proved a non story the first time around BUT all the rags, dippers, arse now parrot it as though it was true or that we have found a loophole as opposed to doing nothing wrong in the first place.
Word ;-)Fuck these crooked bastards.