City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

kippaxblue76 said:
argyle said:
ManCityX said:
image.jpg


I'm actually starting to worry about our friend Nick Harris. This behaviour can't be healthy for him.

Between him and Mark Ogden they were mocking us on twitter.


This cocksucker needs the Adam Tease treatment.

Upon Ogden telling him that Harris was "off message" Harris writes:

@MOgdenTelegraph Do I get arrested for that? No second helpings at Etihad? No 1-2-1 with [third-choice] player? Cripes! What have I done?
 
kippaxblue76 said:
argyle said:
ManCityX said:
image.jpg


I'm actually starting to worry about our friend Nick Harris. This behaviour can't be healthy for him.

Between him and Mark Ogden they were mocking us on twitter.


This cocksucker needs the Adam Tease treatment.
This,or if he is ever in the press box at our ground,wait till he's leaving and twat the fcuker hard...
 
Don't BDO audit our accounts? I doubt they would take too kindly to seeing their integrity being questioned by a set of know-nothing journos.
 
Sam Wallace, one of the few reporters who isn't a twat:

Manchester City are confident that they will comply with Uefa Financial Fair Play regulations this year despite spreading losses from the club’s accounts to subsidiary companies.

City say they have had the structure approved by Uefa, in which two separate companies – City Football Services (CFS) and City Football Marketing (CFM) – have assumed around £25.9m of losses that might otherwise have been on Manchester City’s club accounts. The club announced their most recent financial figures, a combined loss of £23m last month, and as ever these will have to be approved by Uefa in order to receive their license to play in European competition next season.

The club say that spreading the losses outside of City’s accounts is justified given that so many of their staff have a global remit, working for two sister clubs, Melbourne City and the newly-constituted MLS franchise New York City. Executives such as Ferran Soriano, the club’s chief executive, as well as other Manchester-based heads of department, including marketing and commercial, also work in both the United States and Australia.

The turnover of the two subsidiaries CFS and CFM is only likely to rise as the operations at the two sister clubs, especially the MLS franchise, become more involved over the coming years. It will be up to Uefa to decide whether the services assigned to those two clubs, and away from Manchester City’s accounts, is commensurate with the work being done by employees of the club. The club do not believe there is any fresh investigation from Uefa but that, as ever, they are under constant scrutiny from the governing body to ensure that they keep within the prescribed FFP boundaries.

City were judged not to have complied with FFP in the last monitoring period and as a result were subjected to a £49m fine, with two-thirds of that suspended, and a reduced 21-man squad for this season’s Champions League.
 
We lost £23m, which included the £16m fine, so if we added those losses in that makes a total of £49m. We can exclude the £16m fine, which would give us a loss of £33m. Knock off the £20m we excluded last year for youth development and infrastructure and that's an FFP loss of £13m. As we were allowed to lose €20m (£17m), we'd still be OK even if we absorbed that loss into our own accounts.

So what's the problem?
 
All this parent company/subsidiary stuff confuses the hell out of me.

Liverpool figure for amortisation/impairment in 2012/13 figures is £11m less than their parent company. Loss on player sales is £2m less. Number of full time football staff, players, coaches etc is 10 less.

Not sure how that works, the parent operates them and Liverpool ladies which is only small money.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.