LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Their new shirt sponsorDont United have a sponsorship deal with a company that sponsors well over what they earn (or only exist on paper) - pretty sure i saw Rabin post something on it awhile ago.
Their new shirt sponsorDont United have a sponsorship deal with a company that sponsors well over what they earn (or only exist on paper) - pretty sure i saw Rabin post something on it awhile ago.
Nice one.Submitted a complaint to their ‘Readers Editor’ but not holding my breath. Hytner knows exactly what he has written and why, he has been writing about this since 2011 so to pretend it is an innocent mistake is disingenuous in the extreme
2011: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp....jul/12/arsenal-manchester-city-premier-league
2020: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp....ppeal-verdict-tottenham-liverpool-disgraceful
There's a world of difference between 2008 and 2021.Disagree. They’re maybe a year behind where we were when the great Thaksin sold up. Assuming they stay up they’ll be pushing for the top 4 by 24/25 at the latest. I don’t buy the London theory, Manchester’s pretty similar to Newcastle,the same northern city it always was just with a few more twats living in town now. A Louis Vuitton doesn’t really change things much yet we’ve attracted the world’s best players and kept them here.
Top players want $$$ and a working environment conducive to success, if Newcastle provide that then money, as it always has in the past, will talk and they’ll be successful
The Borough and bar codes attracted some top players well before we became a force. Didn't stop them going North.There's a world of difference between 2008 and 2021.
Newcastle won't attract top quality players while there's a risk of relegation. They'll only attract end of career mercenaries with escape clauses in short contracts.
Throw as much money around as you want, the fact is that elite players won't go anywhere near a club that has no chance of European football next season. They're not stupid.
If Newcastle are bidding for the same players as say Arsenal and Spurs, it's a fair bet they'll have to pay massively over the odds in fees and wages to tempt someone to pick NE England over London.
They need a short term fix to keep them in the PL. There's no guarantee they'll stay up, or that if they do, that they'll even get into the PL top ten next season.
As for Newcastle being pretty similar to Manchester... There's a world of difference once you go north of the M62. Transport, housing, employment, weather... Manchester is vibrant and thriving, Newcastle isn't on the same level.
Their fastest way to long term success will be the Super League. The owners know that. That's why they've bought a club with a modern stadium / facilities in the PL.
Football fans may not like it, but that's where the game is going. The elite (richest) clubs will break away as soon as they get another opportunity.
I think Tolmie’s confusion is based around the chatter that it would have been better for some reason if we’d accepted it as being a related party, I recall there were conversations in the FFP thread when the CAS shit was going on as to why it would have made it potentially easier.
That was my original understanding but we were subjected to action that constituted a barrier to entry at the early investment stage which resulted in a fine to City under FFP Regs Was that illegal,?All cartels are illegal as the whole point of one is to gain a business advantage for the members and reduce the attractiveness of those outside the cartel.
Some idiot called Simon Chadwick seems to think the vote is aimed at the SA owners of Newcastle and the AD owners of City as a warning that they can't buy their way to success and have to comply with the rules. Who is this cockwomble living in the past?
Too fuckin right, the two clubs are hated for the ownership. So stuff pandering to these idiots and embrace we are outsiders at the party and will never be embraced by the cartel so fuckem.Jesus Christ they'd be up in arms. It'd be brilliant.