City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

A rough calculation shows that our revenue will be around £537m against theirs of £464m, so we're nearly £75m ahead of them. Their matchday income is around £100m, whereas ours is around £55m, so that in itself doesn't help them. They went out the CL group stage whereas we got to the final but the season before, where the Europena competitions were delayed, they weren't in the CL at all and even though we only got to R16 (when we lost to Lyon) much of the money forthat will be included in these accounts.

So the current financial year could be close, depending on our respective CL performances. But if they don't get top 4 this season the 2023 FY should see us ahead again.
And when does the negotiation start for increased revenue on stadium name and shirt sponsorship?
 
None of our money is ligit though is it, tbf. You need history and to have got your sponsorships through decades of success many years ago for it to mean anything.
 
Or burying it in the sand/skewing an article to headline something else/adding irrelevant data from previous years to make a particular club look bad… and generally avoiding the big takeaway from it, as reported by the FT

Unbelievable Jeff!


“Although City's revenue increased, the club also recorded a net spend of 294m euros on transfers” how is this plausible?

Net was circa £40 m this summer & circa £75m 20/21. How have they got to £250m net spend??
 
Do you get cups for turnover?

Turnover in all businesses is a dick measuring ego trip, profit is king and success on the pitch is all that is important.
It depends. In theory there should be a virtuous circle but not at Man Utd where City panicked executives into buying the likes of Pogba, Sanchez, Maguire and Ronaldo. And then there's their wage bill, debt repayments, dividends to the Glazers...

The-virtuous-circle-of-football-clubs-performance-Note-this-is-inspired-by-Lago-etal_Q320.jpg
 
“Although City's revenue increased, the club also recorded a net spend of 294m euros on transfers” how is this possible.

Net was circa £40 m this summer & circa £75m 20/21. How have they got to £250m net spend??
Simple!

They let a red mardarse write the article.

Oh I bet there was bubbles of snot and tears soaking the keyboard as the realisation hit home.
 
It depends. In theory there should be a virtuous circle but not at Man Utd where City panicked executives into buying the likes of Pogba, Sanchez, Maguire and Ronaldo. And then there's their wage bill, debt repayments, dividends to the Glazers...

The-virtuous-circle-of-football-clubs-performance-Note-this-is-inspired-by-Lago-etal_Q320.jpg
Sadly the rags still make profits, their team is sh1t and long may it continue.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.