Pablo ZZZ Peroni
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,489
I understand that the 220m might be for 4 years rather than 3 ie an average of 55m per year but don't understand why PB has gone with 220m for 5 years at 45m per yer average,I think the point is that the 220M (for argument's sake) was given as 70M, 80M, nil, 70M on a season basis.
Harris has then returned that as a 3-year sponsorship deal not a 4 year one.
I don't think there was a real issue as the accounts were read in 3 year blocks for FFP accounting.
I guess there's a difference between 45M/year each year for 4 years, and 220M over 4 years.