halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,454
Well it all seems to have calmed down in here. Thanks everyone for helping me through this. If I can summarise:
This has been going on for 4 years and we have never co-operated. It was pushed by Liverpool and United, with other clubs on the bandwagon now. There are a handful of actual offences some of which cover breaches of multiple rules in multiple years.
Some are: Mancini's contract, the DS emails (Etihad, Etisalat, ADTA, Aabar), image rights/assets disposal/ shared costs, non-compliance UEFA, non-compliance PL. Maybe one or two more.
All this bollocks about accounts being fraudulent is just that, bollocks, due to clumsy wording from PL. If they are really serious about that, they better be ready for a long, hard fight.
Rumours of an "informer" but means nothing without evidence. Shady informer vs outstanding businessmen. No contest.
My personal view:
Mancini's contract - before FFP, at worst may be rule violation, may be justification. Small issue.
DS emails - same as CAS + Aabar and ADTA. Club confident but may be surprise new emails. Better have stories straight and consistent.
Image rights etc - new charge. If it's about shared services in CFG, good business reasons.
Non-compliance UEFA - fair cop, but already punished.
Non-compliance PL - fair cop, fine.
All in all, very manageable. Certainly not enough to warrant relegation/ titles scrapped or even points deduction.
Unfavorable outcome at Committee, possibility of appeal to courts but need strong case.
I would suggest the club has this under control.
Personal view. May all be bollocks. Shoot it down :)
This has been going on for 4 years and we have never co-operated. It was pushed by Liverpool and United, with other clubs on the bandwagon now. There are a handful of actual offences some of which cover breaches of multiple rules in multiple years.
Some are: Mancini's contract, the DS emails (Etihad, Etisalat, ADTA, Aabar), image rights/assets disposal/ shared costs, non-compliance UEFA, non-compliance PL. Maybe one or two more.
All this bollocks about accounts being fraudulent is just that, bollocks, due to clumsy wording from PL. If they are really serious about that, they better be ready for a long, hard fight.
Rumours of an "informer" but means nothing without evidence. Shady informer vs outstanding businessmen. No contest.
My personal view:
Mancini's contract - before FFP, at worst may be rule violation, may be justification. Small issue.
DS emails - same as CAS + Aabar and ADTA. Club confident but may be surprise new emails. Better have stories straight and consistent.
Image rights etc - new charge. If it's about shared services in CFG, good business reasons.
Non-compliance UEFA - fair cop, but already punished.
Non-compliance PL - fair cop, fine.
All in all, very manageable. Certainly not enough to warrant relegation/ titles scrapped or even points deduction.
Unfavorable outcome at Committee, possibility of appeal to courts but need strong case.
I would suggest the club has this under control.
Personal view. May all be bollocks. Shoot it down :)