Another fantastic article by Martin Samuel today exposing the PL and cartel cronies in their attempt to dictate what is fair in terms of sponsorship deals in relation to Newcastle ...........................................or actually City !
A lone voice in amongst the hyenas of the media doing their bidding for the rags and dippers and other lesser arsewipes who are hanging on to their coat tails.
City ruining football again .
MARTIN SAMUEL: Football's fixture list is a sausage factory
CHIEF SPORTS WRITER: The sausage factory mentality continues. Football learns nothing from the pandemic and continues piling fixtures into a schedule already fit to burst.www.dailymail.co.uk
Interesting that Samuel names the law firm trawling our accounts for something, anything, on behalf of the Premier League, hadn’t seen that information before.
Is that kosher?Makes sense. It's the same clubs who are their clients
It's incredible that this fishing expedition is happening. Looking through our accounts from ten years ago after we have been cleared by an independent panel of judges at CAS. Don't forget that most of the Der Spiegel claims were comprehensively rejected after at least one email was proven to be fabricated (distorting the meaning) and others actually pre-dated the introduction of FFP rules so were totally irrelevant. What the fuck is going on at the PL?Interesting that Samuel names the law firm trawling our accounts for something, anything, on behalf of the Premier League, hadn’t seen that information before.
Well, if someone from the PL had asked Chevrolet if they were sure their deal with United was fair value, the deal would have fallen through.The PL is fishing in very murky waters and, to quote another phrase, it ill all end in tears if it continues. The concept of "fair market value" to be applied to sponsorship deals is a dangerous intrusion into the law of contract. The anger of those responsible for a company on being told that they are wasting that company's money by paying over the odds or that the club may incur penalties if it spends the funds paid can only be imagined. No-one would willingly sign a contract to sponsor a club if they thought they were not getting value for money and they may well seek to know where the PL's authority to exercise a power of veto over commercial contracts comes from. It is certainly not from the law and we saw that the last time one of football's governing bodies interfered in contract law UEFA lost a case and was told in no uncertain terms that the law applied to football as much as to any other activity. Deciding who can and cannot make contracts with clubs on grounds that are explicable only in terms of a cartel putting a rival or rivals at a serious commercial disadvantage is a giant step too far. The PL is in grave danger of getting ideas well above its station. It needs thoughtful, moderate but above all, honest leadership with the real interests of English club football at heart.