laserblue
Well-Known Member
My money’s definitely on oleatthewheel92 being proved right on this.
Oh you litle old pessimist you.
My money’s definitely on oleatthewheel92 being proved right on this.
But whose side do we take when the US declares war in China?10% of CFG.
Latest holdings will be about
ADUG/ Mansour 77%
Silver Lake 10%
Chinese media group 13%
What did PEG do to Andy? Kim must be distraught.We got a mention on the local BBC news.
Main stuff is PEG & fucking Andy Murray.
But but but, its all fake. Alan Green still worrying about what happens when the bored sheik leaves his plaything behind.
Another point: Intellectually this ends the argument that ABu Dhabi controls Man City.
Not from the point that Sheikh Mansour's shareholding is diluted, but that if a state really is investing and controlling MCFC, then it does not need the funds from an overseas partner for growth. Clearly City have been and are operating on a commercial basis, not governmental basis. Expect this point to be lost on those with a vendetta, but I think a major underpinning of the argument that City are an adjunct of Abu Dhabi has just gone. A state doesn't look for financial help from commercial partners that dilute its holding. Although the investment does bring expertise.
can we buy PIGMOL and UEFA now?
Now there is a face I`d never tire of punching."Manchester City in the Champions League? Don't make me laugh!"
One of the classic football related comments of all time.
How do you know it didn't change anything?It's not like Mansour is short of cash to expand the stadium if he wanted to.
Maybe i'll be wrong, but I suspect this is probably not going to mean much to Manchester City or City fans on a day to day basis, just like the 300m from China didn't change anything.
A good sign that the plan is working though, and maybe it'll open up some silicon valley money on the sponsorship side.
This is about moving into the worldwide entertainment business in my opinion.
Not sure what it will look like but at a guess some sort of subscription platform with various levels of access. My guess is that they feel football is nowhere near reaching its potential as an entertainment business. How that fits in with the collective bargaining model we currently have no idea. Maybe much more behind the scenes access ?
Either way I think that this signals significant further revenue growth.