City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[halfcenturyup]

Source?

 

[slbsn]

@slbsn could I ask what is the advantage of having shareholders loans. rather than equity, in the context of Arsenal, Brighton etc.? Is it just that equity level is subject to fluctuation (share price) and also it is easier to extract your cash if need be (ie for other business purposes)...or are there other more nuanced advantages, such as different tax implications?

Tax, ease of administration/company paperwork, more flexible up and down etc. But in reality where the shareholder is near 100% it is not a huge advantage

 

[laserblue]

Panja should be getting zilch respect on this forum after spending many years writing biased and dishonest articles about our club at the behest of others who don’t have our best interests at heart.
He has used every opportunity to paint us in the worst possible light and has been a fucking snide **** whilst doing it.
He’s one of a handful who have been paid shills.
He gets nothing but contempt from me the disingenuous parasite.

He's a snide and malicious agenda driven clickbait liar who's the mouthpiece of enemies of City. And he's a ****.

 

[meltonblue]

View attachment 134918

It’s in the judgment too about who chose who -

 

[KS55]

View attachment 134918

I have obviously misunderstood or been misinformed about the rules.

 

[halfcenturyup]

I have obviously misunderstood or been misinformed about the rules.

Mixing up Section W and Section X maybe .... It happens.

 

[Pontypool Blue]

Nobody knows - I suspect for the 25/26 calculation is most likely by way of some transitional allowance

And the scum's transitional allowance will be £39M more than anyone else! (even though they don't have any loans)

 

[Chris in London]

City on the left PL on the right

That sir is one excellent take

 

[meltonblue]

I have obviously misunderstood or been misinformed about the rules.

You’d be right if you said it about the PLs case against us. Disciplinary proceedings, the chair of the judicial panel appoints the commission. For arbitration, the parties choose one each and whoever they appoint then decide between them on the third.

 

[KS55]

You’d be right if you said it about the PLs case against us. Disciplinary proceedings, the chair of the judicial panel appoints the commission. For arbitration, the parties choose one each and whoever they appoint then decide between them on the third.

Thanks. I obviously mixed up the two cases.