Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
My view is increasingly coming round to the conclusion that the 3 members of the tribunal were founding members of the Stanley Unwin Appreciation Society and are sat there pissing themselves laughing at the chaos and confusion they've caused.For them to be deemed null and void as well as unlawful. I’m no Competition law expert but it seems from what I’ve read to be unclear what the answer is. In those circumstances, I think the Tribunal would find a way to limit the damage to the original APT rules. As I have said even if they are null and void, the replacement regime will be implemented in line with 2021 APT. But of course, I may be completely wrong and APT may never return. Just giving a view.
But like you, I could be completely wrong.