City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

give it to gordon said:
Surely it's just the 19 clubs paying in the 115 case. City can't be expected to pay the pl one twentieth towards the charges against them !

So in this case surely the financial burden fall on the clubs that back the illegal rules
Click to expand...

I gaurentee the PL will ask City to pay their share in the same way that the prison service go after wrongly convicted people for their accomodation costs.
 
flb said:
Unlawful rules are unlawful rules, City have already instigated that further legal proceedings will follow if they aren't overturned, so frankly it could be 19 clubs against us and it wont make a bit of difference if we want to take it further.
Click to expand...
Tweet that to Ziegler.
His head will probably fall off with a bit of luck.
 
manimanc said:
God I really cannot stand looking at this fuckin slaphead whenever someone puts up these desperate tweets of his.
This fella hasn't predicted or reported one thing that has come true yet here he is, his fat smarmy face looking over his cacophony of shite.
Are we surprised this **** has retaliated like he has? He just cannot bring himself to say anything positive.
Click to expand...
He was the first reporter that I know of who said we'd had some wins in the APT case but because he was out regarding the timeline as to when news would come out about it, people started calling him out as a KFA even though it turned out he was pretty much spot on with the important bit.

Don't get me wrong, I think he's a prick at times as it sometimes feels like he's shilling for the PL and the red-shirt cartel cunts but he seems to be well connected a lot of the time AND he was the one who went public with the story about Liverpool hacking our scouting database (although Mullock did say he had that story 6 years before Ziegler but was prohibited from running it)
 
I wonder what advice the prems legal team are telling them ? I would expect them to be giving advice to not break the laws of the land, and i realise that they can only advise and not force the prem to take their legal advice, so at what point do the prems legal team walk away? After all if the client is not listening to your advice what is the point of advising them? All thats going to happen is you tarnish your own reputation by being associated with them .
I do realise they are making a lot of money out of the prem but professional reputation has to play a part .
 
M18CTID said:
He was the first reporter that I know of who said we'd had some wins in the APT case but because he was out regarding the timeline as to when news would come out about it, people started calling him out as a KFA even though it turned out he was pretty much spot on with the important bit.

Don't get me wrong, I think he's a prick at times as it sometimes feels like he's shilling for the PL and the red-shirt cartel cunts but he seems to be well connected a lot of the time AND he was the one who went public with the story about Liverpool hacking our scouting database (although Mullock did say he had that story 6 years before Ziegler but was prohibited from running it)
Click to expand...
He's still a **** like you say.
I don't like any journalists apart from Martin Samuel.
 
Last edited:
My understanding is that City have abstained from voting in both the introduction of APT in Nov 2021 and the RPT amendments in February 2024.

I think the reasoning was by voting either way then they would be giving credibility to rules they believed to be unlawful.

If the PL goes ahead with this vote tomorrow then I believe City will abstain once again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.