City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

I thought there was gonna be no winners or losers in this vote today, yet according to all the media reports City have lost.
 
You have misunderstood, they have said it's unfair if FMV interest rates aren't included in the PSR calculations. Your statement "unlawful if they aren't included" demonstrates this, you were claiming that shareholder loans were being used to prop up clubs to meet PSR this would mean they WERE included.
The transfer analogy was regarding you saying that they are unfair because other clubs don't have shareholder loans, nobody is stopping them from getting some so you can't blame other clubs if your owners aren't prepared to provide them!

Yep but all those clubs now who have loans on 0% now won't be punished but only future ones will be fair value loans! Wasn't that's in the new amendment that got passed today?!
 
Shareholder loans cannot be used to get a club over the PSR line. Although if they were it wouldn't be unfair on clubs without them unless they were prevented from obtaining a shareholder loan. Your saying the equivalent that it's unfair we paid 100 million for Grealish because Ipswich couldn't afford to buy a player for 100 million.
But a £75 million exemption can for the rags. An exemption 75 times MORE than any other club. Tail definitely wagging the dog in this case. That alone needs looking into, not necessarily because of the amount but because of the huge differential between one Premier League member and the other 19 clubs. How can that be justified is beyond belief. But we can't claim corruption or collusion where the rags are involved, we are told to shut up and turn a blind eye if you don't want any trouble.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.