Semper aggressus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Sep 2019
- Messages
- 6,600
- Team supported
- Manchester City
The Guardian have revealed that Sunak is blaming City's finance team for not independently verifying his costings of Labour's tax plansIn all this clamour to make City look like baby eating mass murderers saying that the transfer market will be turned into ‘the wild west’. Has anyone asked the question what if what the Premier League has been doing is unlawful?
Also is this a complete load of hyperbole as they only want the rules reverting back to pre February 2024. The club were hardly bidding £300 million for Mbappe before then.
If it was Arsenal who leaked the latest story, would that be acting in good faith?Sorry - didn't realise you meant the PL. But there's the PSR rules and then there's the other, generic PL rules about acting in 'utmost good faith' (whatever that means). I mean, did Liverpool act in 'utmost good faith' when they accessed our scouting data illegally?
I don't think the PL are alleging we've broken PSR rules (which are detail-lite) but they've used the catch-all about acting in utmost good faith.
I thought that. If City can prove that Arsenal leaked details to the press then surely it is a breach of the confidentiality rules.Are City able to sue them or anything?
First the infamous letter now this. A leopard never changes its spotsAre City able to sue them or anything?
Odious club and fan base, imagine taking defeat so badly, it really is the most pathetic response imaginable.
I think that’s a slight misinterpretation. He said unlikely to win when discussing certain aspects of the challenge, such as voting rights.Disappointing to hear Stefan on Talkshite say City probably won’t win the case.