City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Day three of my pursuit to fight back on Facebook. Two main things.
Dipper boy has not come back since I outed him on “all the serious charges were time barred.”
But this one is potentially my all time favourite.

“City’s chairman already owns one country and now he’s trying to take over the UK”
The time barred accusation always shows what the real agenda is. As we were not guilty of any charges (except non cooperation,why would we?)Why do all the sheep assume we are guilty of the time barred one's. Especially when it wasn't our fault it went out of time.
 
What does he mean by Abu Dhabi's charmless reign? It doesn't make any sense given that City are owned by Sheikh Mansour (75pc) and US investors Silver Lake (25pc). Is he suggesting that all of Abu Dhabi is charmless, the entire population, every single person. Why would he say something like that? Is it because, as Alf Garnett used to say: "They are all the same aren't they"?
Charmless? charmless? has the cnut never watched Khaldoon.
 
Last edited:
there not arguing at present about FMV but how money was paid and by whom
That's in the "115" charges rap, nothing to do with this current challenge, the PL are saying our sponsors are "related parties" and as such can be scrutinised by the PL and the value can be reduced. We're saying that's illegal under competitiveness rules.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.