eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Zebra pants gate was the definition of cheating, getting a game called off because you have a few injuriesStill waiting for united to be punished for fans invading Old Trafford and getting game called off
Zebra pants gate was the definition of cheating, getting a game called off because you have a few injuriesStill waiting for united to be punished for fans invading Old Trafford and getting game called off
I think it would be very difficult to get damages if we were acquitted of the 115. The PL would maintain they were just doing their job. We would need to show bad faith. Perhaps the emails disclose something, otherwise we could be whistling in the dark.
Agree. I am sure as well that at some point or other a player will have decided against joining us and joined a rival partly due to having doubts about any potential punishment. Yes, we've coped pretty well and signed alternatives, but who knows if a player could have specifically said no because of the charges? Maybe we'd even have that info already.
Not once in my life have I listened to talk sport does that make me odd?
Khaldoon always maintained in his end of season reviews that people shouldn't throw stones who live in glass houses.
How can you not trust this fella? He is as honest as the day is long.
( suggs 1980)
No I tried it once or twice, here’s the thing though even if it was any good for sport talk, ( it isn’t no good at all) the constant inane non sport chatter, adverts news means there’s only about 15 / 20 minutes actual sport content in any hour. How anyone can listen is a mystery to me.Not once in my life have I listened to talk sport does that make me odd?
It was and still remains a scandal. Not least because postponing that game indirectly had an effect on CL places because it meant rearranging games.Zebra pants gate was the definition of cheating, getting a game called off because you have a few injuries
You are a saint mate not odd at.all just very luckyNot once in my life have I listened to talk sport does that make me odd?
I doubt it. It’s a stretch.
1. Any damage from the 115 is too remote from them. It is OUR accounts that are in question. There is an inference that Etihad and its auditors are complicit, I suppose. Not enough.
2. The PL valuation is an opinion and doesn’t carry any negative implication for Etihad.
Perhaps @projectriver has a view. My thin knowledge of these things is 30 years out of date!