The PL voted on an illegal rule change, without ( i believe) being told they could not do so, or even why they should/could not do so. i do not believe the PL have to release information on any appeal or grievance, it is very much a closed shop when it wants to be.But all 20 PL clubs are involved by definition.
The PL clubs voted for a change, therefore they must be informed if the change failed in any way. This isn't Masters and the PL exec doing it off their own bat.
I doubt that any prospective rule change or vote is dropped on clubs at the meeting without any prior notice. It won't have all the details of the hearing, just the salient judgments.
'Lawful' rather than 'sustainable' perhaps.Fair point, but at the point the rulebook comes out there will be questions. I don't see how the PL can avoid answering them.
If the PL are forced to revert to the previous version, all it will say is that legal advice was that the amendment was not sustainable and that the PL will therefore revisit the issue during the next season.
'Lawful' rather than 'sustainable' perhaps.
I'm doubting that clubs knew it was illegal?If City have proven it was illegal what actions will be taken against the pl and the clubs that voted for this illegal action ?
even though we abstained at the original vote stating we believed it was?I'm doubting that clubs knew it was illegal?
It’s a good job there’s loads of amateur sleuths on twatter who do then .I'm doubting that clubs knew it was illegal?
I'm guessing the other teams have lawyers etc who thought it wasn't illegal.even though we abstained at the original vote stating we believed it was?