City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

It’s exactly what i've been saying to my mates for the last 4/5 months. Non City supporting mates who support a variety of teams and can't see that the PL in their pursuit of stopping City are just blindly stumbling into completely destroying what made the PL the best league there is.
Wait till the Balon Dor results are out in a couple of months - and see how many non City PL players are in the top 30.

Masters and co have strangled investment into all PL clubs which has ensured no elite players are coming to England this Summer.
 
It's like the dumbing down of education standards in the pursuit of fairness for all. The result will be that the general standard falls. In education there is no "competitor" waiting in the wings to usurp the governing body.

In aligning investment with the worst performing clubs in the league you will stifle and hamper those at the top. The Spanish, German and Italian Leagues must be pissing themselves laughing. As said by others with the current hiatus in the rules leaving clubs unsure what they can commit to there will be little movement particularly in big names coming to the PL unless of course there are some more hotels or huge assets available to sell to yourself somewhere.

To be frank, nobody is "proving" City's owner paid money into Etihad to pay City's sponsorship for 10 years because it didn't happen. Thats what was found at CAS and will likely be the same outcome in November. To suggest we agreed a sponsorship contract worth 40 million a year for 8 million is ludacris and we know there is no evidence that proves we did. Let's also be clear there is no "charge" that any of City's sponsorships were overvalued from either the PL or UEFA only internet whining from Nick DIckhead and the red shirted imbeciles.

So that leaves us with;

a) a perfectly legal external contract for our manager in 2010 for maybe a million a year and;
b) the bending of a few rules regarding player image rights to earn a few million quid more for 2013, which was subsequently quickly curtailed and ended in 2015;
c) a perfectly legal one time pre-contractual agreement to pay Etisalat sponsorship through a 3rd party loan in 2 amounts totalling approx 15 million quid, all of which is properly accounted for in the books.

I find it astonishing that rival clubs fans believe that the above, occurring over a period of 12 years is sufficient to send City into some kind of stratospheric incline and spew their vitriol all over the internet yet within the last 12 months Chelsea have just sold 2 hotels and their Women's football team to themselves for a net gain of 470 Million and not a fucking whisper from the same doom merchants or the media shill cunts of the Whatsapp Group. That combined with the alleged evidence from Cypriot banks regarding Abramovic's backhander payments made to agents and player representatives off the books also with essentially "no comment" from the same media. The fact the PL have "allowed" it to happen without a single real statement of condemnation or sanction whilst at the same time carrying out a four year investigation into City without seemingly a shred of real evidence shows us where we are and what were up against.

If the independent committee proceedings in November go as we suspect with insufficient proof of the alleged "fraud" to make a finding against us apart from "none co-operation" in certain aspects, we should go balls out to have Masters and his shills removed and then come down heavy on any shithouse journalist who wants to stick his head up above the parapet.

I'm tired of this shit, I want it done but dealt with in a proper fashion so we can get back to enjoy the winning of silverware and the most successful years of the club I love, without the undercurrent of impropriety.
 
It's like the dumbing down of education standards in the pursuit of fairness for all. The result will be that the general standard falls. In education there is no "competitor" waiting in the wings to usurp the governing body.

In aligning investment with the worst performing clubs in the league you will stifle and hamper those at the top. The Spanish, German and Italian Leagues must be pissing themselves laughing. As said by others with the current hiatus in the rules leaving clubs unsure what they can commit to there will be little movement particularly in big names coming to the PL unless of course there are some more hotels or huge assets available to sell to yourself somewhere.

To be frank, nobody is "proving" City's owner paid money into Etihad to pay City's sponsorship for 10 years because it didn't happen. Thats what was found at CAS and will likely be the same outcome in November. To suggest we agreed a sponsorship contract worth 40 million a year for 8 million is ludacris and we know there is no evidence that proves we did. Let's also be clear there is no "charge" that any of City's sponsorships were overvalued from either the PL or UEFA only internet whining from Nick DIckhead and the red shirted imbeciles.

So that leaves us with;

a) a perfectly legal external contract for our manager in 2010 for maybe a million a year and;
b) the bending of a few rules regarding player image rights to earn a few million quid more for 2013, which was subsequently quickly curtailed and ended in 2015;
c) a perfectly legal one time pre-contractual agreement to pay Etisalat sponsorship through a 3rd party loan in 2 amounts totalling approx 15 million quid, all of which is properly accounted for in the books.

I find it astonishing that rival clubs fans believe that the above, occurring over a period of 12 years is sufficient to send City into some kind of stratospheric incline and spew their vitriol all over the internet yet within the last 12 months Chelsea have just sold 2 hotels and their Women's football team to themselves for a net gain of 470 Million and not a fucking whisper from the same doom merchants or the media shill cunts of the Whatsapp Group. That combined with the alleged evidence from Cypriot banks regarding Abramovic's backhander payments made to agents and player representatives off the books also with essentially "no comment" from the same media. The fact the PL have "allowed" it to happen without a single real statement of condemnation or sanction whilst at the same time carrying out a four year investigation into City without seemingly a shred of real evidence shows us where we are and what were up against.

If the independent committee proceedings in November go as we suspect with insufficient proof of the alleged "fraud" to make a finding against us apart from "none co-operation" in certain aspects, we should go balls out to have Masters and his shills removed and then come down heavy on any shithouse journalist who wants to stick his head up above the parapet.

I'm tired of this shit, I want it done but dealt with in a proper fashion so we can get back to enjoy the winning of silverware and the most successful years of the club I love, without the undercurrent of impropriety.
What's he got to do with it?
 
I really don't think it's a question of "blindly stumbling". Our enemies are not stupid. If the PL fails, they ride off into the glorious red sunset of the ESL, blaming everyone else for the PL's failings.
It's a possibility but I'm sure someone would notice the ESL missing the only English team to win four (at least) PL titles in a row.
 
Guidance
‘Normal market conditions’ are typically those in which revenues bear a reasonable relationship to any
costs incurred, taking into account the economic value of the product supplied or service provided.
Normal market conditions shall typically be assessed through benchmarking, i.e. in light of the terms
under which comparable Transactions carried out by comparable Clubs have taken place in comparable
circumstances.
Adopting a tender process that attracts bids from non-Associated Party bidders is good evidence that
the resulting Transaction has been concluded in normal market conditions, subject to any applicable Fair
Market Value Assessment. However, that will be the case only where the necessary conditions are
satisfied, being non-discriminatory treatment of all bidders at all stages of the procedure and objective
selection and award criteria being specified in advance of the process. For completeness, a lack of
competing bids from non-Associated Parties is not, in and of itself, determinative that the Transaction in
question has not been concluded in normal market conditions.
In any event, an assessment of normal market conditions shall consider all the relevant circumstances of
the particular case. There can be exceptional circumstances in which a Transaction, even if carried out at
market prices, may not be considered in line with market conditions. For instance, and by way of example
only, where a Transaction does not meet an actual need of the Associated Party, they may not be acting
in a manner similar to that of a non-Associated Party under normal market conditions. Accordingly,
Transactions carried out under such conditions may confer an advantage on a Club which it would not
have obtained under normal market conditions.
A.1.98. “Fair Market Value Assessment” means an assessment as to whether the
consideration either paid or received or to be paid or received by the Club, Player,
Manager or Senior Official (as applicable) pursuant to a Transaction represents Fair
Market Value. In conducting a Fair Market Value Assessment, the Board is required to:
(a) consider:
(i) an assessment of the value of the Transaction produced by an independent
expert procured by the Board (save that the Board may elect not to obtain
an assessment by an independent expert where the Transaction in question
involves no consideration paid or to be paid to the Club, Player, Manager or
Senior Official or involves the sale or loan of a Player’s registration);
(ii) any relevant information provided by the Club (including any assessment
of the value of the Transaction produced or procured by the Club); and
(iii) such comparable evidence of the values of similar Transactions as is
appropriate, relevant and readily available to it at the time of the
assessment; and
(b) comply with any protocols agreed by Clubs for that purpose (including the Fair
Market Value Assessment Protocol – Commercial Rights Agreements at
Appendix 18 of the Rules). For the avoidance of doubt, where there is no such
protocol in place applicable to a particular type of Transaction, the Board will
conduct the Fair Market Value Assessment as it sees fit, in compliance with
paragraph (a), above;
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.