City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[remember arthur mann]

Why quote this fucking clown ?

Well we quote Ten Bob, and he's an even bigger clown.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Do not tell Stoned Rose

?

 

[Bluearmy]

But then they wouldn't have tabled it in the first place, presumably?

It could have been added some time ago (previous meeting), so this could explain that. Piss up in a brewery no doubt, but it is the PL we are talking about so anything’s possible….

 

[marco]

piss is boiling on the cafe

 

[HelloCity]

 

[marco]

shirly the prem would have a plan B 'wouldnt they' or maybe not as its the prem

 

[Gundoggin]

Newcastle FC tweeting stuff about huge sponsor deals from Saudi now . Plenty know a lot it seems !

 

[SouthStandStander]

Change the thread title again. Fun while it lasted.

 

[Ric]

Something huge has been leaked to the red top media though .

Not necessarily. They may have just got wind of the amendment being pulled and jumped to a conclusion in order to be the first to break the story.

 

[BerkshireBlue]

Could be wrong but I don't think City challenged the APT rules in their entiretly, just the new amendments.

we was for related parties but always against associated parties. quite rightly as well. One's standard accountancy and the other is just made up nonsense.