Liverpool? Sorry, I meant Chelsea.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Liverpool? Sorry, I meant Chelsea.
Snoop, Doggy, Dog.Nothing off him tonight. Sun's out so a nice night for dogging.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Yes the leak sums up City's argument which is in the broadest terms that you can't trust the PL.Agree , the leak surely isn't a good look for the PL either.
PistonBlue
Well-Known Member
Have they opened one on their main sponsor funding terrorism?RAWK have reopened their thread on us in light of today’s events. It was so obvious.
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,853
Who is this pls?
jim tolmies perm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 2,518
That's how I see it , a civil court dealing with competition lawGenerally agree. But is it an independent commission, though?
No idea who this legal case is brought in front of, but I imagine if it is against the PL and there is further chance of loss claim, then it is nothing to to do with the PL's commissions, independent or not. The article refers to a tribunal. That, or some level of court, sounds more logical.
Jam Tomorrow
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 8,390
Who leaked it? Well whose sponsor has had its appalling misdeeds plastered across the media today.
So it broke on the same day as Charter Standard scandal & you think Liverpool are the leak?One of the clubs contacted for their input (the PL are treating confidentiality so seriously they even got permission from the tribunal to do that).
Probably Liverpool given the source.
Nah, them cheeky American chappies would never play dirty like that….
SouthStandStander
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,303
I honestly love this legal shit. Piss boiling on and off the pitch!
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,113
Generally agree. But is it an independent commission, though?
No idea who this legal case is brought in front of, but I imagine if it is against the PL and there is further chance of loss claim, then it is nothing to to do with the PL's commissions, independent or not. The article refers to a tribunal. That, or some level of court, sounds more logical.
It's reported as a Section X tribunal under PL rules. Each party chooses an arbitrator and the two choose a chairman.
Not sure how a PL tribunal can make judgments on competition law personally, no matter what the rules say. But I'm not a lawyer.