That's a great point. I don't know if it's possible but it looks like a solid case.I'm a few pages behind - so this may have already been raised
If it is the case that Everton have voted with the PL because otherwise their interest on shareholder loans made have seen them fail PSR and be subject to a further penalty................
Would it mean that Luton - who finished 4 points behind Everton and got relegated - not have a possible claim against the PL. This because if - at the time - Everton were benefitting from unlawful loans they may have been sanction by at least 4 points and they would have been relegated rather than Luton?
Making a decision before the Tribunal makes their recommendations.... Non collaborative, adversarial and arrogant. The sooner the leadership, and maybe the organisation, is brought down, the better.
It saddens me how stupid people can be and their rush to demonstrate it.FB full of idiots thinking we will be relegated after this morning's vote,unbelievable.
I can’t think of another logical explanation for the pL to not wanting to wait a month or so for the final verdict by the ICAre they allowing for legal challenges to deliberately delay sponsorships for City. This part makes no sense to me but I’m sure it’s a thought out strategy, just not by Masters.
As others have said, this vote is almost irrelevant. The only thing that really matters is the tribunal’s final deliberation. Hopefully we will get that soon.
2022-23 Premier League Shareholders Loans Table Rank Club Money Owed 1. Everton £451m 2. Brighton £373m 3. Arsenal £259m 4. Chelsea £146m 5. Leicester £132m 6. Bournemouth £115m 7. Liverpool £71m 8. Wolves £65m 9. Brentford £61m 10. Crystal Palace £38m 11. Nottingham Forest £23m 12. Aston Villa £10m 13. Fulham £1m 14. Southampton £0 15. Manchester City £0 16. Manchester United £0 17. Newcastle United £0 18. Tottenham Hotspur £0 19. West Ham United £0 20. Ipswich Town Unknown
I don't think you are the only one confused. Common sense would say waiting for the IC's ruling on the matter was the correct thing to do. It stinks of arrogance.I’m confused why the premier league needed to rush this vote through.
Vote today - Prem league get the result they want.
Vote in a few weeks - Prem league would still get the result they want.
The only difference would be if the panel give a contrary instruction on the rules.
There is no advantage to City being in this position in a few weeks so what are the premier league up to?
Are they allowing for legal challenges to deliberately delay sponsorships for City. This part makes no sense to me but I’m sure it’s a thought out strategy, just not by Masters.