We don't know in any detail precisely what City challenged with regard to APT and it's fairly clear that there has been no ruling. City can't/won't comment and Lawton, Keegan and Panja say only that City appear to have won a victory, significant or otherwise, or seem to have failed in their challenge. Panja seems to suggest failure on both APTs and rule making, which Khaldoon described as the tyranny of the majority (or some such phrase). It does not "seem" that all three have any real idea of what a ruling says. Much seems to rest on the pulling of the proposal to amend the regulations at the PL meeting today but the significance of this is unclear and a subject of controversy: interpretations seem to range from a victory to City to Stefan's contention that it could just as easily mean a clear victory for the PL. Anything is possible. We shall have to wit and see ... if the ruling is ever made public.