City launch legal action against the Premier League

[kaz7]

Not everything is a conspiracy, why would 3 retired judges want to damage their reputation to side with the PL?

This either a PL law that is wrong or its not.

Retired judges have money , nice mansions and pensions,not sure they are bothered about reputation

 

[Gone for a Burton]

Is the outcome of this case subject to confidentiality clauses on all parties ?

 

[Manchester1894]

Is the outcome of this case subject to confidentiality clauses on all parties ?

I think so. I'm sure if the rulebook for the premier League is pulled and amended this week we'll know we've been successful.

 

[halfcenturyup]

Is the outcome of this case subject to confidentiality clauses on all parties ?

That's all the rules say about communication, I think.

 

[Protein Junkie]

I understand that some of our fans are seeking Nirvana here. It is unfortunate to see Blue on Blue arguing over what the state of play should look like.

Modern media is a race to the bottom for the uneducated. Irrespective of whether Stefan appears on Talk sport or not we cannot stem the ferocious tide of bile that has been coming our way. It has stated many a time on here that the Cartel followers will only listen to diatribe that accentuates our “Guilt”. In fact, I would dare to say that the more rational the response from us, the more incomprehensible the case becomes to your average dipper, rag et al.

That is way I keep on stating “a wise head keeps a still tongue”.

The only place to challenge is at the IC, anything else is just moot imho.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

Not everything is a conspiracy, why would 3 retired judges want to damage their reputation to side with the PL?

This either a PL law that is wrong or its not.

For the same reason the ex Belgium PM decided we were guilty without any evidence, you are basically selling your reputation, with this being a non disclosure, it is money for old rope.
The only worry is if City sue in a court over a restriction of trade, where they will simply say different rules.

 

[halfcenturyup]

For the same reason the ex Belgium PM decided we were guilty without any evidence, you are basically selling your reputation, with this being a non disclosure, it is money for old rope.
The only worry is if City sue in a court over a restriction of trade, where they will simply say different rules.

Leterme was a politician involved in a number of corruption and nepotism scandals, iirc. He should have been nowhere near a UEFA investigative process and, now, post-City (presumably as a result of UEFA's investigation into the leaks of confidential information) he isn't.

These arbitrators are 1,000 times more trustworthy than that **** ever was.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

Leterme was a politician involved in a number of corruption and nepotism scandals, iirc. He should have been nowhere near a UEFA investigative process and, now, post-City (presumably as a result of UEFA's investigation into the leaks of confidential information) he isn't.

These arbitrators are 1,000 times more trustworthy than that **** ever was.

He also fucked up the PSG case, but still got ours

 

[cheekybids]

He also fucked up the PSG case, but still got ours

I think you’ll find he made the decisions they wanted.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

I was going to tell you what he did in the PSG case, but you know what, i think you summed it up well, with just enough intrigue. :)