City now beginning to Market themselves properly

biffa

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 May 2004
Messages
859
One thing I've noticed from the press at this early stage of the transfer window is something that hasn't been there since Sheikh Mansour took over - positive write-ups!
David Pullan recently installed as our Brand and Marketing Officer seems to be making in roads, and doing a fine job. Yeah, sure there are a few papers and articles that will claim we're still ruining football, but if you haven't already read it this article says it all from the Torygraph;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...h-Barry-is-latest-shot-in-power-struggle.html

It's particularly pleasing, especially if you know a couple of scouse fans!

Look closely at the club crests of Manchester United and Manchester City and perhaps the only thing that the Mancunian rivals share in common – a 19th century trading ship – sits provocatively on both badges.

Provocatively? Any Liverpool supporter with even the merest understanding of their club's age-old rivalry with United will tell you the ship signifies the Manchester Ship Canal, the opening of which in 1894 sparked the decline of Liverpool as one of the world's great port cities and triggered Manchester's emergence as the north's most powerful city. United and City, by nodding to Manchester's history, are just rubbing it in.

But just as the first vessel sailing down the Ship Canal 115 years ago began Liverpool's economic downward spiral, perhaps City's £12m move for Gareth Barry last week signalled the start of the endgame in Manchester's century-old attempt to emasculate Liverpool.

Who could ever have predicted, though, that the mortal blows would be struck by City rather than United? For so long England's comedy club, the great under-achievers, City are now emerging as a new force in world football thanks to the incredible wealth of Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

United and Liverpool have always fought for supremacy, yet City are now going after the pair of them, on and off the pitch.

City's building plans are starting from Ground Zero. Twenty-four hours after United announced a world-record £80m shirt sponsorship deal with Aon, City added to their £25m shirt tie-up with Etihad Airlines by unveiling a 10-year kit agreement with Umbro worth more than £50m.

United remain way out on the horizon, but City are looking beyond their neighbours. Sheikh Mansour's plans for the club are long-term, they involve huge investment and the ultimate aim is for City to be the perfect shop window for the 'can do' mentality of Abu Dhabi.

"If you look at all the moves that they [Abu Dhabi] have made, such as bringing F1 and the FIFA Club World Cup to Abu Dhabi and the investment in Manchester City, they have a plan which is about building the reputation and the name of Abu Dhabi, and creating a country that doesn't have to rely on oil," claims David Pullan, the club's recently-installed Brand and Marketing Officer.

"With City being a Premier League club, Abu Dhabi can build a very clear view to the world of what it is and what it is about. Roman Abramovich was invisible before he bought Chelsea, but everybody in the world knows everything about him now – the good and the bad.

"That's what football gets you. It gets you a platform to the whole world and Abu Dhabi want to use it positively to build their reputation globally.

"It's not about matching and emulating Manchester United. It's the New York Yankees, the LA Lakers, Barcelona – organisations which, over a long time, have sustained a global position. That's the challenge here at Manchester City.

"They [Abu Dhabi] think long-term. On the Abu Dhabi website, there is a 22-year plan for the country. Here, we think about next week and we don't even know who the government could be on Friday, never mind in 22 years' time!

"When they ask where we want to be in five years' time, we tell them, but they say 'great, but go bigger!' You can see from the Barclays deal last week [when Sheikh Mansour sold shares at a £1.5bn profit] that the guy knows what he is doing."

City's move for Barry last week, an almost surgical strike on Aston Villa that resulted in the England midfielder heading to Eastlands, is likely to be repeated time and again this summer.

Samuel Eto'o, Carlos Tevez, Roque Santa Cruz and Joleon Lescott are the immediate priorities. Peter Crouch, Edin Dzeko and Thierry Henry are also on manager Mark Hughes's radar.

"Signing the big names will clearly make my job easier," admits Pullan, who was lured from Aegis in March. "One of the attractions of coming here was that the club is going through a massive period of change and everything is improving across the board.

"There is a real sense that, with all the investment going on in the infra-structure and the squad – £100m last season and Gareth Barry already this summer – it's just a fantastic time to be around. There is real, positive momentum.

"We have to be very careful that we don't get into a situation where the marketing tail wags the dog, however. I would never want to get in a situation where I was even suggesting we should sign a player because it would help us from a marketing perspective or help us sell more shirts in country."

Pullan is driving City's move to launch a new multi-media website on July 1 which he promises will 'leapfrog' those in the world of football and entertainment.

But despite City's global ambition, Pullan admits that the club has to remain loyal to the Mancunian fan-base that has sustained it through decades of disappointment.

He said: "In the season just finished, 80 per cent of people who came to our matches lived within 45 minutes of the stadium.

"That beautifully demonstrates the point that City has been at the heart of Manchester and that's really important for us. We have this mission of building a really successful and sustainable football club of the future, but being the football club of the future also means being true to who we are. This is not a club that is going fund its expansion by fleecing the fans."
 
Thank God the website is being improved. It can be such a powerful tool to use and right now Premier League teams are lagging behind other sports in exploiting this new market. Take a look at <a class="postlink" href="http://www.mlb.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">www.mlb.com</a> and you can see just how far association football has to go to catch up. It is such a massive revenue stream that is presently untapped. With our new millions, we should be bold and withdraw from the SKY TV monopoly and instead open our own TV channel that shows every single game live, as well as simultaneous live streams on the internet in HD quality [MLB shows games in HD quality up to 3.2 mb/sec] plus radio feeds that can then be streamed to smartphones [the IPhone already has apps that let you listen to games lives].

The future is the internet, it just needs someone to be bold and break away from SKY. City and United are the only two clubs with the revenues to contemplate such a far reaching move. Bare in mind though: this is exactly what the New York Yankees did, and look how it has paid off for them.
 
Ubiquitous said:
Thank God the website is being improved. It can be such a powerful tool to use and right now Premier League teams are lagging behind other sports in exploiting this new market. Take a look at <a class="postlink" href="http://www.mlb.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mlb.com</a> and you can see just how far association football has to go to catch up. It is such a massive revenue stream that is presently untapped. With our new millions, we should be bold and withdraw from the SKY TV monopoly and instead open our own TV channel that shows every single game live, as well as simultaneous live streams on the internet in HD quality [MLB shows games in HD quality up to 3.2 mb/sec] plus radio feeds that can then be streamed to smartphones [the IPhone already has apps that let you listen to games lives].

The future is the internet, it just needs someone to be bold and break away from SKY. City and United are the only two clubs with the revenues to contemplate such a far reaching move. Bare in mind though: this is exactly what the New York Yankees did, and look how it has paid off for them.

Welcome to Bluemoon! :)

I don't think we'll break away from Sky as it smacks of ''we're bigger than the game'' syndrome and will lead to us being alienated. I would hate it if other fans looked upon us as money-grabbing mercenaries. We certainly don't need the money anyway.
 
Great article! Very positive! Im well into NBA basketball and the LA Lakers are a massive name in world sport 2nd behind Boston Celtics in being successful and are in the NBA finals again this year, which is NOW BTW (watch it on C5 or Setenta every game is on live!) to be aiming as big as them is a huge undertakement(probably not a word but hey) and shows where the Sheikh wants to take City to!

Oh my God how exciting! To think we're signing the likes of De Jong, Barry and Robinho and being linked with Kaka and Eto'o now! In 15 years we'll be turning down pleas from the worlds best because we have too many stars! In our lifetime we could have a player up there with Michael Jordan, Pele, Muhammed Ali playing for City!

YES! :D
 
JOGAMIGMOG said:
Ubiquitous said:
Thank God the website is being improved. It can be such a powerful tool to use and right now Premier League teams are lagging behind other sports in exploiting this new market. Take a look at <a class="postlink" href="http://www.mlb.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mlb.com</a> and you can see just how far association football has to go to catch up. It is such a massive revenue stream that is presently untapped. With our new millions, we should be bold and withdraw from the SKY TV monopoly and instead open our own TV channel that shows every single game live, as well as simultaneous live streams on the internet in HD quality [MLB shows games in HD quality up to 3.2 mb/sec] plus radio feeds that can then be streamed to smartphones [the IPhone already has apps that let you listen to games lives].

The future is the internet, it just needs someone to be bold and break away from SKY. City and United are the only two clubs with the revenues to contemplate such a far reaching move. Bare in mind though: this is exactly what the New York Yankees did, and look how it has paid off for them.

Welcome to Bluemoon! :)

I don't think we'll break away from Sky as it smacks of ''we're bigger than the game'' syndrome and will lead to us being alienated. I would hate it if other fans looked upon us as money-grabbing mercenaries. We certainly don't need the money anyway.
Thank you for the welcome.

I appreciate the fears around bad PR as I along with every other blue appreciates our historic reputation as 'the neutrals favourite', however we shouldn't let this get in the way of a golden opportunity to exploit a huge gap in the market. The Yankees were criticised for exactly the same things that you have mentioned. However, their bad PR manifested into record turnovers and several world championships after a gap of many years, not to mention the huge influx of new fans across the globe that high quality internet streaming has brought.

Instead of the fans viewing the club as money grabbers, I think they would instead rejoice at being able to watch their team in high quality each week, regardless of whether we are on SKY or not.

These are exciting times for the club, and right now we share a massive advantage over every other team in world football. However, we cannot rely solely on our money to maintain our advantage, as you can be sure even richer, even more ambitious owners will come along and buy or rivals. We must move on now, whilst there is a gap in the market, and exercise our advantage to the maximum before the window of opportunity closes.

Exciting times.
 
Ubiquitous said:
Instead of the fans viewing the club as money grabbers, I think they would instead rejoice at being able to watch their team in high quality each week, regardless of whether we are on SKY or not.

This, This, This... oh god please this!

I'd subscribe in a heartbeat... hell I'd even do pay-per-view!
 
Felt really pleased with the City situation of late.

Always been proud to be a blue on my part but now I'm starting to feel proud of City.
 
Petetheblu said:
Felt really pleased with the City situation of late.

Always been proud to be a blue on my part but now I'm starting to feel proud of City.

Me too. It's a nice feeling isn't it. Makes up for the years and years of pain and misery! I know that when we win the League I will be in floods of tears and I can't wait!
 
I do agree that we should look very carefully at MLB.com, as it is light years ahead of the Premier League in untapping the power of the internet to generate money for football.

However, I think the club will struggle to do this on their own. I think it will have to be a collective move from the league, but for sure City should look to lead on this. Knowing Cook et al, I am sure they will.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.