Don't think we usually play 2 fullbacks & an academy player all as CB's, a RB & Fernando as a CM partnership, a 20 year old RW at LWB, an academy RB at RWB, a LW at CAM.. That's as poor a side as City will play all season - and Celtic still couldn't win.That's an unknown. Do you usually find it difficult to beat the bottom three teams?
Or are you just making an exception?
No it wasn't. Tierney and Sinclair would be in. I accept you made nine changes, but, look at them. They cost over £100m.
Don't forget your first team couldn't beat us either.
A wee tad sour grapes me thinks.
You have no divine right to win. And two attempts at a shite Scottish team and you get 2 points.
It's either we are better than you give us credit for or you are a lot worse than you believe.
It can't be both.
Your shout.
There is no way on fucking Earth there were that many there.51,297. Not bad for a dead rubber.
51,297. Not bad for a dead rubber.
Haven't a clue how many were actually there. The only area where it looked to me where there were big gaps was in SS3.There is no way on fucking Earth there were that many there.
At one point they even said City allowed Roberts to play.
Well the ones who went were blues. And we have a rag thread for those who don't even attend home games.Rags or blues needing a slap tonite, hmmm
Kelechi has barely played for weeks, he needed the minutes before Saturday.Dead rubber or not we need to get into the habit of winning home games. I thought it strange aguero didn't play given he can't play the next 4. Willy staked a big claim. Maffeo looks promising.
It was arguably a tough group, but unless I’m mistaken, City qualified for the Last 16 with a game to spare.
Celtic played well in the 3-3, but then committed the classic Scottish error of taking their eye off the ball when facing a supposed lesser team.
Yes, you won the European Cup in the days when it often only took 4 games to reach the Final, but if you actually got your wish and played in England, then once the novelty wore off, you’d be like Sunderland or Newcastle ,struggling to attract the better players, even with all the Premier League money, and never playing in Europe.
We didn't need to. UEFA rules prevent us stopping him playing against us.I thought we did give permission for him to play both games against us
Once again don't knock Celtic's 67 European Cup win , it was a magnificent achievement at the time against the mighty Inter Milan and they beat the Rags to it by a year, and look how much retro publicity the Rags victory gets.It was arguably a tough group, but unless I’m mistaken, City qualified for the Last 16 with a game to spare.
Celtic played well in the 3-3, but then committed the classic Scottish error of taking their eye off the ball when facing a supposed lesser team.
Yes, you won the European Cup in the days when it often only took 4 games to reach the Final, but if you actually got your wish and played in England, then once the novelty wore off, you’d be like Sunderland or Newcastle ,struggling to attract the better players, even with all the Premier League money, and never playing in Europe.