Without wanting to keep banging on about buying a suitable top class CB (but I'm going to), this is why I don't understand why we didn't go balls out to buy VVD. Pep ideally wants to stick all his eggs in one attacking basket as you say. In my view if we had managed to get VVD, Pep would have had a much better chance of being able to do that in games like this than by buying Sanchez IMO.I wonder if Pep is going to acknowledge the fact that they potentially have the beating of us on the counter attack unless we take measures to prevent it, or just stick all our eggs in one attacking basket & hope we roll them over & get away with it ?
And if he does ignore their threat & we get tonked, even with our new fullbacks etc, will he adapt from then on, or just keep repeating the same, Pellegrini style ?
I'd like it to be possible we can overrun them playing Pep ball, that would be spectacular, but if he tries it & sees it go horribly wrong, baring in mind it's his 2nd season, I'd like to think he'd be willing to adapt.
I don't mind seeing him have a go, full on, at this stage, as long as he's willing to accept the lessons & adapt for similar opponents, if it fails.
Without wanting to keep banging on about buying a suitable top class CB (but I'm going to), this is why I don't understand why we didn't go balls out to buy VVD. Pep ideally wants to stick all his eggs in one attacking basket as you say. In my view if we had managed to get VVD, Pep would have had a much better chance of being able to do that in games like this than by buying Sanchez IMO.
I was of the understanding that VVD only wants to go to Liverpool, and that Southampton in any case refuse to sell. So complaining we did not buy him seems not to make a lot of sense. This is the real world, not a computer game.Without wanting to keep banging on about buying a suitable top class CB (but I'm going to), this is why I don't understand why we didn't go balls out to buy VVD. Pep ideally wants to stick all his eggs in one attacking basket as you say. In my view if we had managed to get VVD, Pep would have had a much better chance of being able to do that in games like this than by buying Sanchez IMO.
No takers then - not surprised reallyPep is a nutter. I could see him throwing in Yaya, Danilo, Delph or Gundogan next to Fernandinho.
I could also see him do nothing defensive minded on a wing and a prayer.
God only knows.
I was of the understanding that VVD only wants to go to Liverpool, and that Southampton in any case refuse to sell. So complaining we did not buy him seems not to make a lot of sense. This is the real world, not a computer game.
You are right, the dig was not necessary. Sorry about that. I had been reading the Pep Guardiola performance thread and gotten annoyed with all the back stabbing and Pep bashing going on there from the hysterical crew.Not sure the computer game dig is necessary. My point was that I don't understand why we didn't go balls out to try and get him, not I don't understand why we didn't ultimately end up with him. I know there could still have been reasons why a deal might not have got done even if we did really make a fist of trying to get him but we didn't even appear to be terribly interested once Southampton named their price. Not that I'm convinced at all that he would have refused us, particularly once Southampton made it more or less impossible for him to go to Liverpool but still it would have required Southampton being prepared to sell, I am aware of that.
Anyway, it is more of a general point than purely complaining that we didn't make a proper go of trying to buy VVD. IMO buying a quick strong CB who is more likely to be able to cope with the counter attack would actually allow us to be more attacking than buying more forwards. Do you have an opinion on that?