City V United Spending.

[Manchester_lalala]

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-last-five-seasons.html

Net spend for United, City and Chelsea broadly the same for last 5 years

Daniel levy is a money grabbing twat. I'd be fuming if I was a Spurs fan looking at that table.

 

[Henkeman]

Yes yes, but they earned it remember?

There's no point telling them this stuff.

 

[Sergi0 Na5r1]

All I know is the lineup we defeated at the last Manchester derby was the most expensive side ever fielded by a Premier league team.

And I remember reading something a few days ago online which shows Chelsea and Utd have now outspent us by 30-40 million. They had a nice graph on the thing can't remember it now. Anyway Rooney is paid more than six times Sterling's wages, you know there's something wrong at Old Twatford.

 

[Bluep*ss]

Since Mancini took over we've spent £299m nett to their £282m nett according to <a class="postlink" href="http://www.transferleague.co.uk/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transferleague.co.uk/</a>

In the last four seasons they've spent £269m nett to our £176m nett from the same site. Chelsea have spent £200m nett and Liverpool £141m nett over the same period.

Probably best not to include the pre Mancini years.

Tell him the stats. above. Biggest spenders Rags , Chelsea , City , Pool.

Let him digest that. Also as mentioned above Rags put out the most expensive team in Prem history a couple of months ago.

 

[Cityfan]

To be honest when we are spending filthy ill gottenlucre and they are basically dispensing benficence to others there is no moral comparison.
We really are not worthy of existing on the same planet.

 

[Silva_Spell]

Since Mancini took over we've spent £299m nett to their £282m nett according to <a class="postlink" href="http://www.transferleague.co.uk/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transferleague.co.uk/</a>

In the last four seasons they've spent £269m nett to our £176m nett from the same site. Chelsea have spent £200m nett and Liverpool £141m nett over the same period.

Probably best not to include the pre Mancini years.

and that site has us spending 15m or so more than we actually did last season

nor does it include the supposed 'loan' of Falcao

 

[kippaxblue76]

Oops wrong thread.

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

Since Mancini took over we've spent £299m nett to their £282m nett according to <a class="postlink" href="http://www.transferleague.co.uk/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transferleague.co.uk/</a>

In the last four seasons they've spent £269m nett to our £176m nett from the same site. Chelsea have spent £200m nett and Liverpool £141m nett over the same period.

Probably best not to include the pre Mancini years.

When you consider Mancini had to effectively buy two teams - one to get us in to the top 4 and another to challenge for the title - whereas they were a side already at the top, it puts our relative spending levels into perspective. As always, rags = hypocritical filth........

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Garth Crooks

on Final Score

Leicester City v Manchester City (15:00 GMT)

Posted at


"Sergio Aguero is out, so City should park that. Manuel Pellegrini should focus on Edin Dzeko, and what a great opportunity for him. He's been out of favour and his nose has been put out of joint, so what a great chance for him now."


He's been out injured you Ignorant pompous prick.

Garth Crooks is a moron in the clinical sense.

 

[BlueTG]

No point in arguing as all of their players are born and bred Manchester United.