City wage bill

John.des said:
Bayern has players on less money than some of our bench players. The likes of Kroos, Dante at Bayern (not the biggest stars but important players), are getting less than 100k per week in €. We have Lescott, Rodwell, Richards on similar wages. They wouldnt get close to play at Bayern, they are hardly playing for us these days...
But if I remember well when Txiki first looked at the squad worth and the wage list he nearly fell off his chair. I read it somewhere surely, didnt make it up.:)

I hope we continue what we started that giving smaller fix wages with greater bonuses. If the infos are right none of Navas, Negredo, Fernandinho are over 100k per week. Maybe if all the bonuses would be active they would be even on 120-150k.
But if they arrived here around 2008-2010, their basic wage could have been 150-200 basic wage maybe. Thats where the inflation comes from. I mean we did pay 15-17m for a crocked RSC and 12m for Bridge and 80-90k per week wages. We still had to pay these wages last year when they were out on loan. Or Adebayor still being paid as we had to pay off him next to the pretty low fee we got for him as his wages were high so any possible fee became pretty low.
thats why we couldnt sold Barry for a fee, werent many going to pay his wage and some fee on top of it. At least Everton took him on loan and hopefully pay his wages in full.
Also for Dzeko, it could make it harder to sell him if wants the same wages he gets here at his next club.

I am not against to give huge wages to great players, but we really gave huge wages to some mediocre players or not world class players.
What else were we going to offer these players, we had no European football, its Manchester not London/Milan/Paris etc a team that was full of no hopers and has/beens the only incentive we could give to get our squad moving in the right direction was cold hard cash. Cook said as much once in an interview but once we got towards challenging we could restructure our pay<br /><br />-- 16 Apr 2014, 11:31 --<br /><br />
aguero93:20 said:
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
For me it means we have to assess whether we are getting value for money on some of the players.

Its crunch time this summer for

Barry gone anyway??
Milner definitely yes
Dzeko this one i'll give you
Kolorov best lb in the league
Nasri negotiating new contract, probably same terms as Yaya
Richards probably going
Lescott gone anyway??

I would imagine the wage bill for those 7 players alone is £30m a year.

The question is, can we replace them with players who are not quite top level but close to it and get similar players for half the cost.

These are the questions the powers that be will be asking themselves.
Hmmm it would depend for me what would be on offer for Milner he has hardly not had game time this season
 
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
For me it means we have to assess whether we are getting value for money on some of the players.

Its crunch time this summer for

Barry
Milner
Dzeko
Kolorov
Nasri
Richards
Lescott

I would imagine the wage bill for those 7 players alone is £30m a year.

The question is, can we replace them with players who are not quite top level but close to it and get similar players for half the cost.

These are the questions the powers that be will be asking themselves.

Why? He's pretty good no?
 
LFC-Fans said:
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
For me it means we have to assess whether we are getting value for money on some of the players.

Its crunch time this summer for

Barry
Milner
Dzeko
Kolorov
Nasri
Richards
Lescott

I would imagine the wage bill for those 7 players alone is £30m a year.

The question is, can we replace them with players who are not quite top level but close to it and get similar players for half the cost.

These are the questions the powers that be will be asking themselves.

Why? He's pretty good no?

He's certainly better than Pellegrini thinks he is.
 
Same article that was in the Daily Mail yesterday which was advertising a website. Overly exaggerated article and not showing the full truth.
 
Just looking at the numbers now. $202m is our wage bill according to them, divided by 25 players that makes our average.

25 seems to be the nominal figure given to premier league clubs.

Looking at the Dodgers, their payroll is $38m more than ours, but they've divided it by 31 players to get their average. Which is odd as only 25 are eligible to play for the team at any time until September.

"Average Annual Pay" is calculated from base player salaries from current or most recently completed seasons from each sport. All totals exclude endorsements, performance bonuses, appearance fees and any other source of extra compensation. All figures converted to U.S. dollars. The lists include money paid in salaries to players who form the 'first-team squad' or active roster across a season.
 
moomba said:
Just looking at the numbers now. $202m is our wage bill according to them, divided by 25 players that makes our average.

25 seems to be the nominal figure given to premier league clubs.

Looking at the Dodgers, their payroll is $38m more than ours, but they've divided it by 31 players to get their average. Which is odd as only 25 are eligible to play for the team at any time until September.

"Average Annual Pay" is calculated from base player salaries from current or most recently completed seasons from each sport. All totals exclude endorsements, performance bonuses, appearance fees and any other source of extra compensation. All figures converted to U.S. dollars. The lists include money paid in salaries to players who form the 'first-team squad' or active roster across a season.
That's strange, our wage bill does include another 15 EDS players at least and our coaching staff after all.... How did they miss that?? hmmm....
 
The undeserving rich get richer(player's) whilst the undeserving poor get poorer (rip off ticket prices)
Think it's called capitalism !
 
aguero93:20 said:
moomba said:
Just looking at the numbers now. $202m is our wage bill according to them, divided by 25 players that makes our average.

25 seems to be the nominal figure given to premier league clubs.

Looking at the Dodgers, their payroll is $38m more than ours, but they've divided it by 31 players to get their average. Which is odd as only 25 are eligible to play for the team at any time until September.

"Average Annual Pay" is calculated from base player salaries from current or most recently completed seasons from each sport. All totals exclude endorsements, performance bonuses, appearance fees and any other source of extra compensation. All figures converted to U.S. dollars. The lists include money paid in salaries to players who form the 'first-team squad' or active roster across a season.
That's strange, our wage bill does include another 15 EDS players at least and our coaching staff after all.... How did they miss that?? hmmm....

Plus loan players, analysts etc. 222 football staff according to our last annual report.
 
moomba said:
aguero93:20 said:
moomba said:
Just looking at the numbers now. $202m is our wage bill according to them, divided by 25 players that makes our average.

25 seems to be the nominal figure given to premier league clubs.

Looking at the Dodgers, their payroll is $38m more than ours, but they've divided it by 31 players to get their average. Which is odd as only 25 are eligible to play for the team at any time until September.
That's strange, our wage bill does include another 15 EDS players at least and our coaching staff after all.... How did they miss that?? hmmm....

Plus loan players, analysts etc. 222 football staff according to our last annual report.
Average annual salary of around £800,000 then, where does that put us?
 
This is an 'alternate' table, maybe a more relevant one? I think it divides the total amount by the number of players. Surprisingly only the DAILY MAIL (of all papers) have used this as the lead story (Barcelona stars earn £25m over five years... more than the average pay of any other team in world sport!), while the others such as the Telegraph, whose knives have been out for City in recent days, run with the MONEYBAGS CITY OMG!!! story.

article-2605345-1D21A9CF00000578-162_620x427.jpg
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.