PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
Very, very nice. And their away shirt is quite simply a thing of beauty.
That is nice. Don't think much to their home one, though it's nice to have the option without the sponsor.
Very, very nice. And their away shirt is quite simply a thing of beauty.
Should just cancel the Puma deal and go back to Umbro. They`re underrated
I think most people would agree that Umbro make decent kits. Given a choice between a nice shirt or a fuckload of extra cash in our coffers then I’m afraid it’s a no brainer for the club.Should just cancel the Puma deal and go back to Umbro. They`re underrated
The sheik should be able to compensate us with some dirty human rights-breaking oil money then. Umbro is so much better than Puma and NikeDoubt they can afford us to be honest.
Not only is the new West Ham kit beautiful you can also get it sponsor less. God I wish Umbro could afford us.
Not only is the new West Ham kit beautiful you can also get it sponsor less. God I wish Umbro could afford us.
Ever? Not even close to this pile of shite
Possibly the worst home kit we’ve ever had?
And with Etihad being from the human rights abusing, torturing, gay killing UAE, we should definitely have that choice :-)I may be mistaken but isn't there some sort of dispensation that allows clubs to sell unsponsored shirts if the sponsoring company is an alcoholic beverage or betting company? Those that object to drinking alcohol or gambling for moral/religious reasons most likely wouldn't want to wear a football shirt promoting those activities.
I'm not sure the league, or whomever it is that decides these matters, would see it reasonable to have people objecting to airlines, automotive makers, or tyre companies for reasons like that.
Which just happened to coincide with me taking retirement. My lads thought it would be a good idea to get it signed and framed as a nice leaving present.. Bastids.Not even close.
The 16/17 monstrosity from Nike was worst ever imo.